From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/vhost: Add function to retreive the 'vid' for a given port id Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:43:29 +0800 Message-ID: <20160914044329.GX23158@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1473774463-26966-1-git-send-email-ciara.loftus@intel.com> <28342659.xFrdpVFeBf@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ciara Loftus , dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921C67F14 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:43:02 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28342659.xFrdpVFeBf@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 05:10:09PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-09-13 14:47, Ciara Loftus: > > In some cases when using the vHost PMD, certain vHost library functions > > may still need to be accessed. One such example is the > > rte_vhost_get_queue_num function which returns the number of virtqueues > > reported by the guest - information which is not exposed by the PMD. > > > > This commit introduces a new rte_eth_vhost function that returns the > > 'vid' associated with a given port id. This allows the PMD user to call > > vHost library functions which require the 'vid' value. > > I think we should not add any API to the PMDs. In general, I agree with you. > Maybe you are looking for a generic API in ethdev. But maybe it's a bit hard to define a "right" generic API here. For this case, the generic API I can think of could be: - an API to get queue num, like rte_eth_get_queue_enabled_num I barely know NIC pmd drivers, but I doubt it's useful/meaningful for them. - an API to get a PMD driver private (or specific) data. For vhost-pmd, it's vid. Again, I don't know what it could be for other nic drivers. This one may be a better option here, because it expose a key field to the application, vid, with which the application can invoke more vhost APIs. And apparently, it's not feasible to try to define a generic API for some (if not each) vhost APIs. Or, better ideas? --yliu