From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755514AbcINFf3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 01:35:29 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:47736 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751676AbcINFf2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 01:35:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:35:25 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Christoph Hellwig , sstabellini@kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, jgross@suse.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: consolidate swiotbl_xen dma_ops Message-ID: <20160914053525.GA15534@lst.de> References: <1473611708-25179-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20160912114539.GB7597@gmail.com> <20160912145146.GA27766@lst.de> <20160913183726.GB32416@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160913183726.GB32416@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:37:27PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > I can be passive-aggressive too, so: > > NAKed-by: Ingo Molnar > > If the ugliness that makes the patch much harder to review than it should be is How about not beeing a dick? If you ask _nicely_ to respin it anyway I'd be happy to do it, but if you get up on a bad foot please let it out on someone else.