From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6329987466337976320 X-Received: by 10.237.36.113 with SMTP id s46mr2631486qtc.18.1473870339290; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.10.23 with SMTP id 23ls1271444otg.44.gmail; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:25:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.16.68 with SMTP id o4mr2579485oto.32.1473870338811; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-x244.google.com (mail-pf0-x244.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c20si1456863pfc.1.2016.09.14.09.25.38 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of kdunne@mail.ccsf.edu) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mail-ccsf-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of kdunne@mail.ccsf.edu) smtp.mailfrom=kdunne@mail.ccsf.edu Received: by mail-pf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id 128so991121pfb.0 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:25:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail-ccsf-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=qeVd52UF/Uc/DqxZ0mJpsPDCahhjrpiyzXVA6irPx1Y=; b=h2mvz2dOuz/cwIZyyAkt9lQyzvYTdMKJD+WikEdDV+v9974ymqsAxxJ+Cx/ZQqMHPr lJGQT9A0aKJ6z2uFOtgSD6SXN9+msvyj74KjEz/VT4zLk1J4WI2kwx+poA26fVG4A8sL 4oKtgEKuPRwNk8BFWrqCTy5fOdfT3TDT9s9yYH+A9M8r3V6pzMIx9SXDeHTwaNYKNccj 2qWF68Cm8FVrRU259PSElRwUYwnLgfp5NvF5Z7UwY+RZopwIuIFQZtHLtawYiY5FGj42 IkyByRgSrMAlBuayZ4lyVXBchSaxPbv4QGipNMzUhES6r3gzr5XcSrcnmgH5eNbWvAUM dscA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=qeVd52UF/Uc/DqxZ0mJpsPDCahhjrpiyzXVA6irPx1Y=; b=M9SCkkNjCQqN7t55Wugu2eTwiDu8vf3Fqo4E3D4zU1H6TkuZBVCmRL+7yrw6Wz3hrz 5D9AOD6GMBay3ncnhH2mwvt+Vpg+uBd1FnUV4KxnOOZSaGZnf2M3SYmAaKwAXLgJNd5V ywEvBxHFJvDc6SlrEa4JpGB2mY+5hDr7lxegECwGWcmSKMBgk7AOE2ECa4fm1dMb3iF3 0QoCvKkYDmXDmMwipuhrOcVMIlIbgnBSyvrQqVLXThCqyoPC9Na+stMpsL9EqH+GKuV0 K8y1opd/dF0l5lLiFa8XmqC3wGZakqd6KdNpkpmlsiyFsqwY0/D2lpA/dePF3t4L64SW Hshw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOQq6UZvZn2/L9y+yNVP50YfpeEmCs4laLOE4LiUUYO/dibEmy/kprOqN9J6SefgmSU X-Received: by 10.98.60.68 with SMTP id j65mr6067623pfa.55.1473870338587; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from katie-Inspiron-5748 ([2001:558:6045:106:7d84:83db:c3b2:274a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i8sm6656166paw.25.2016.09.14.09.25.37 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:25:36 -0700 From: Katie Dunne To: Daniel Baluta Cc: Alison Schofield , outreachy-kernel Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: iio: ad5933: align arguments on new line with open parenthesis Message-ID: <20160914162536.GA9023@katie-Inspiron-5748> References: <20160914010414.GA441@katie-Inspiron-5748> <20160914051142.GA7205@d830.WORKGROUP> <20160914141041.GA2039@katie-Inspiron-5748> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 05:18:12PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Katie Dunne wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:11:43PM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:04:14PM -0700, Katie Dunne wrote: > >> > knaack.h@gmx.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net > >> > Bcc: > >> > Subject: [PATCH] staging: iio: ad5933: align arguments on new line with open parenthesis > >> > Reply-To: > >> > >> Hi Katie, > >> Something odd happened just above here...with the cc list and subject > >> repeating. > > > > Thanks Alison. Something weird happened with mutt where the subject > > disappeared so I had type it twice. I will try to figure out what went > > wrong. > > > >> It looks like some of these can be pulled into less lines. If it fits > >> within 80 chars, it's fine on one line. See below. > > > > I wasn't sure if I could do this in the same patch, but that makes > > sense. > > > > I will send a v2. > > Hi Katie, > > Just to make sure that everything works fine, it's always a good idea > to send the email first only to yourself. > > Then if it looks good send it to everybody :). I usually find late problems > with this approach. Thanks, Daniel. It looks like the problem was how I was formating the Cc list in mutt. I sent it only to myself first and it looked correct. But adding multiple emails addresses incorrectly changed the formatting. Katie > > thanks, > daniel.