From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Versioning scheme for rdma-plumbing Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 23:15:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20160915061509.GB4869@infradead.org> References: <20160914044745.GB7975@obsidianresearch.com> <20160914122820.GA32048@infradead.org> <20160914173327.GJ16014@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160914173327.GJ16014-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Leon Romanovsky , Doug Ledford , Devesh Sharma , Hal Rosenstock , Mike Marciniszyn , Moni Shoua , Sean Hefty , Steve Wise , Tatyana Nikolova , Vladimir Sokolovsky , Yishai Hadas , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:33:27AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > - it allows for much smoother minor updates. I hope this will be > > rare, but my experience from various projects tells me that they > > will occasionally be needed. > > Can you explain this some more? > > If we use a single integer ala udev, I'd see minor updates, LTS > branch, etc being released with a suffix eg: 123.2 Well, that's not a monotonically increasing version number anymore. And at least in the past systemd folks argued against even doing these releases. If you're fine with doing minor releases off these single component versions this argument goes away of course. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html