From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer via iovisor-dev <iovisor-dev-9jONkmmOlFHEE9lA1F8Ukti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
To: Brenden Blanco <bblanco-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom-BjP2VixgY4xUbtYUoyoikg@public.gmane.org>,
"iovisor-dev-9jONkmmOlFHEE9lA1F8Ukti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org"
<iovisor-dev-9jONkmmOlFHEE9lA1F8Ukti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>,
"netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Daniel Borkmann
<borkmann-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: XDP user interface confusions
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:14:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915201402.15b65136@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi Brenden,
I don't quite understand the semantics of the XDP userspace interface.
We allow XDP programs to be (unconditionally) exchanged by another
program, this avoids taking the link down+up and avoids reallocating
RX ring resources (which is great).
We have two XDP samples programs in samples/bpf/ xdp1 and xdp2. Now I
want to first load xdp1 and then to avoid the linkdown I load xdp2,
and then afterwards remove/stop program xdp1.
This does NOT work, because (in samples/bpf/xdp1_user.c) when xdp1
exits it unconditionally removes the running XDP program (loaded by xdp2)
via set_link_xdp_fd(ifindex, -1). The xdp2 user program is still
running, and is unaware of its xdp/bpf program have been unloaded.
I find this userspace interface confusing. What this your intention?
Perhaps you can explain what the intended semantics or specification is?
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-15 18:14 Jesper Dangaard Brouer via iovisor-dev [this message]
2016-09-15 18:58 ` XDP user interface confusions Brenden Blanco
[not found] ` <20160915185835.GA4418-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-21 7:18 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer via iovisor-dev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160915201402.15b65136@redhat.com \
--to=iovisor-dev-9jonkmmolfhee9la1f8ukti2o/jbrioy@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bblanco-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=borkmann-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=brouer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tom-BjP2VixgY4xUbtYUoyoikg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.