From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 00/15] RFCv2: Consolidated userspace RDMA library repo
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:16:26 -0600
Message-ID: <20160916161626.GB2833@obsidianresearch.com>
References: <1471889618-1605-1-git-send-email-jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
 <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB07FB7A@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB07FBE1@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <20160913180342.GA6933@obsidianresearch.com>
 <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB08075C@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <20160913222539.GB29095@obsidianresearch.com>
 <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB080798@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <edc4c963-847a-e973-f1f1-ab9b78ad9d19@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <edc4c963-847a-e973-f1f1-ab9b78ad9d19-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" <linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Devesh Sharma <Devesh.sharma-laKkSmNT4hbQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Hal Rosenstock <hal-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>, "Marciniszyn, Mike" <mike.marciniszyn-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Moni Shoua <monis-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>, Steve Wise <swise-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>, "Nikolova, Tatyana E" <tatyana.e.nikolova-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Vladimir Sokolovsky <vlad-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>, Yishai Hadas <yishaih-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:12:17AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:

> I would.  Mainly because it is tied to both the kernel uAPI (via
> netlink)and to librdmacm

With what little I know about ibacm I'm inclined to agree. It seems
like a utility for librdmacm, and is consuming a kernel interface.

Reconsider Sean?

> (such that librdmacm changes how it builds when ibacm is present, so
> if we don't include it, then ibacm becomes a requirement of the
> larger package if you want librdmacm to support the ibacm cache
> service).

I double checked and I couldn't find anything like
this. librdmacm/src/amc.c builds unconditionally and contains no
ifdefs, configure does not key on anything to do with acm.

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html