From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com (mail-pf0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3sb9vz5wfdzDsGT for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 20:08:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id q2so795864pfj.0 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 03:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 20:08:06 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin To: Madhavan Srinivasan Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, anton@samba.org, paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] powerpc: Avoid using EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1 macro in MASKABLE_* Message-ID: <20160916200806.3fc20217@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1473944523-624-8-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1473944523-624-1-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1473944523-624-8-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 18:31:57 +0530 Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > Currently we use both EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1 and __EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1 > in the MASKABLE_* macros. As a cleanup, this patch makes MASKABLE_* > to use only __EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1. There is not logic change. > > Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan I assume this was done like this once for some macro expansion issue? If it doesn't cause any breakage, then fine. Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin