From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:43623 "EHLO
        bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S933723AbcIUVDi (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:03:38 -0400
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:03:32 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
        linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] watchdog: add watchdog pretimeout framework
Message-ID: <20160921210332.GA9759@roeck-us.net>
References: <1472644370-16982-1-git-send-email-vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
 <20160905164923.GA1548@katana>
 <29631170-1687-fbd0-8072-6a65b8868009@mentor.com>
 <7bec61ce-8bab-d4be-cca4-ec3c0025e2fb@roeck-us.net>
 <20160921183423.GB1513@katana>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160921183423.GB1513@katana>
Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:34:24PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > I am sure there is something I missed, but all I could find was nitpicks
> > not worth a resend, so at least for my part I think we should get this in.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> 
> Thanks! Your watchdog-next is not included in linux-next, though?
> 
No.

Guenter