From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S965971AbcIVVje (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:39:34 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53418 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1754269AbcIVVjc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:39:32 -0400
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:39:21 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
        Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] futex: Throughput-optimized (TO) futexes
Message-ID: <20160922213921.GA30291@linux-80c1.suse>
References: <1474378963-15496-4-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
 <1474441172.27308.19.camel@gmail.com>
 <57E319BE.2050208@hpe.com>
 <20160922074932.GV5008@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609221236010.5599@nanos>
 <20160922144123.GB13358@linux-80c1.suse>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609221641540.5599@nanos>
 <20160922151144.GC13358@linux-80c1.suse>
 <57E43A46.9080601@hpe.com>
 <57E43EF9.8000400@hpe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57E43EF9.8000400@hpe.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Waiman Long wrote:

>BTW, my initial attempt for the new futex was to use the same workflow 
>as the PI futexes, but use mutex which has optimistic spinning instead 
>of rt_mutex.

Btw, Thomas, do you still have any interest pursuing this for rtmutexes from
-rt into mainline? If so I can resend the patches from a while ago.

Thanks,
Davidlohr