From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S966639AbcIZOzP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:55:15 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:49761 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S965716AbcIZOzO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:55:14 -0400
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:55:12 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, LKP <lkp@01.org>,
        "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [xfs] 68a9f5e700: aim7.jobs-per-min -13.6%
        regression
Message-ID: <20160926145512.GA16612@lst.de>
References: <20160813003054.GA3101@lst.de> <20160813214825.GA31667@lst.de> <20160813220727.GA4901@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20160813221507.GA1368@lst.de> <20160813225128.GA6416@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20160814145053.GA17428@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20160814161724.GA20274@lst.de> <87vaz1n5ay.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> <87a8g4ihg7.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> <87k2dzi3eg.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87k2dzi3eg.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Ying,

> Any update to this regression?

Not really.  We've optimized everything we could in XFS without
dropping the architecture that we really want to move to.  Now we're
waiting for some MM behavior to be fixed that this unconvered.  But
in the end will probabkly stuck with a slight regression in this
artificial workload.

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4199148420541560167=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [xfs] 68a9f5e700: aim7.jobs-per-min -13.6% regression
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:55:12 +0200
Message-ID: <20160926145512.GA16612@lst.de>
In-Reply-To: <87k2dzi3eg.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
List-Id: <oe-lkp.lists.linux.dev>

--===============4199148420541560167==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Ying,

> Any update to this regression?

Not really.  We've optimized everything we could in XFS without
dropping the architecture that we really want to move to.  Now we're
waiting for some MM behavior to be fixed that this unconvered.  But
in the end will probabkly stuck with a slight regression in this
artificial workload.

--===============4199148420541560167==--