On Thursday 29 September 2016, okaya@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2016-09-29 05:10, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 September 2016, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >> On 9/28/2016 3:23 PM, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 28 September 2016 20:22:40 Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >> >> On 9/28/2016 1:02 PM, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> >> >>>> Thanks, It sounds like you have more than one machine with similar
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> problems. Can you collect the log from the other machines with
> >> >>>>> 4.8-rc8?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> and also a boot log with 4.6 kernel where things are working?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The attached logs are from another machine:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> dmesg-bad-debug.txt: 4.8-rc8 with your debug patch - bad
> >> >>>
> >> >>> dmesg-reverted.txt: 4.8-rc8 with patches (as per Rafael's
> >> >>> suggestion) reverted - good
> >> >>>
> >> >>> dmesg-3.6.txt: 4.6 (Debian kernel) - good
> >> >>
> >> >> I think I see a race condition for the SCI interrupt. I need another
> >> >> dump from 4.8-rc8 with the attached patch to confirm. Let's remove
> >> >> the previous one and apply this one.
> >> >
> >> > dmesg-reverted.txt: 4.8-rc8 w/patches reverted (good)
> >> > $ head /proc/interrupts
> >> >            CPU0
> >> >   0:       8531    XT-PIC  timer
> >> >   1:          9    XT-PIC  i8042
> >> >   2:          0    XT-PIC  cascade
> >> >   8:          1    XT-PIC  rtc0
> >> >  11:        713    XT-PIC  acpi, uhci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb2, nvkm,
> >> > eth0 12:        161    XT-PIC  i8042
> >> >  14:       4042    XT-PIC  pata_via
> >> >  15:          0    XT-PIC  pata_via
> >> > NMI:          0   Non-maskable interrupts
> >> >
> >> > dmesg-bad-debug.txt: 4.8-rc8 (bad)
> >> > $ head /proc/interrupts
> >> >            CPU0
> >> >   0:       8027    XT-PIC  timer
> >> >   1:        286    XT-PIC  i8042
> >> >   2:          0    XT-PIC  cascade
> >> >   8:          1    XT-PIC  rtc0
> >> >  10:          0    XT-PIC  uhci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb2
> >> >  11:          0    XT-PIC  acpi, nvkm, eth0
> >> >  12:        161    XT-PIC  i8042
> >> >  14:       4069    XT-PIC  pata_via
> >> >  15:          0    XT-PIC  pata_via
> >> >
> >> > (I'm moving between different machines through the day - these logs
> >> > are from different machine than the last ones).
> >>
> >> Can you try these patches on your machines please?
> >
> > It doesn't even boot :(
>
> Ok, since I have not seen the full boot log I am guessing that isa api
> gets called before the link objects are initialized.

Netconsole did not work (probably because it crashes too early?) and I don't 
have a null-modem cable.

> Can you appply the first three only (0001, 0002 and 0003) to see if it
> makes a difference?

It boots with first 3 patches only but the problem remains - see the attached 
log.

-- 
Ondrej Zary