From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752899AbcJCJZR (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2016 05:25:17 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:58408 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752423AbcJCJYp (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2016 05:24:45 -0400 Message-Id: <20161003091234.879763059@infradead.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.63-1 Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 11:12:34 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, xlpang@redhat.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jdesfossez@efficios.com, bristot@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, During my last PI failing patch set it became obvious there's a number of related fail in FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI that needed sorting before we can move on with that stuff. These here patches are the result of staring at that code for a wee bit. Please have a very _very_ careful look at the last patch, it appears to not explode when running: - perf bench futex lock-pi - selftests/futex but given the immense amount of tricky involved with both PI and futex there is bound to be something I've overlooked. Do people have more/better futex-pi test cases?