From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:37816 "EHLO mail-wm0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751965AbcJCRyM (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:54:12 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b201so96127123wmb.0 for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 19:54:09 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: Excessive xfs_inode allocations trigger OOM killer Message-ID: <20161003175407.GA26788@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <87a8f2pd2d.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20160920203039.GI340@dastard> <87mvj2mgsg.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20160920214612.GJ340@dastard> <20160921080425.GC10300@dhcp22.suse.cz> <878tuetvl6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20160926200209.GA23827@dhcp22.suse.cz> <878tu5xrmx.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878tu5xrmx.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Florian Weimer Cc: Dave Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Mon 03-10-16 19:35:18, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Michal Hocko: > > >> I'm not sure if I can reproduce this issue in a sufficiently reliable > >> way, but I can try. (I still have not found the process which causes > >> the xfs_inode allocations go up.) > >> > >> Is linux-next still the tree to test? > > > > Yes it contains all the compaction related fixes which we believe to > > address recent higher order OOMs. > > I tried 4.7.5 instead. I could not reproduce the issue so far there. > Thanks to whoever fixed it. :) The 4.7 stable tree contains a workaround rather than the full fix we would like to have in 4.9. So if you can then testing the current linux-next would be really appreciated. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f69.google.com (mail-wm0-f69.google.com [74.125.82.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C718B6B0069 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:54:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f69.google.com with SMTP id d64so88999643wmh.1 for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com. [74.125.82.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m4si35848849wjk.108.2016.10.03.10.54.11 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b201so96127152wmb.0 for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 19:54:09 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: Excessive xfs_inode allocations trigger OOM killer Message-ID: <20161003175407.GA26788@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <87a8f2pd2d.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20160920203039.GI340@dastard> <87mvj2mgsg.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20160920214612.GJ340@dastard> <20160921080425.GC10300@dhcp22.suse.cz> <878tuetvl6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20160926200209.GA23827@dhcp22.suse.cz> <878tu5xrmx.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878tu5xrmx.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Florian Weimer Cc: Dave Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Mon 03-10-16 19:35:18, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Michal Hocko: > > >> I'm not sure if I can reproduce this issue in a sufficiently reliable > >> way, but I can try. (I still have not found the process which causes > >> the xfs_inode allocations go up.) > >> > >> Is linux-next still the tree to test? > > > > Yes it contains all the compaction related fixes which we believe to > > address recent higher order OOMs. > > I tried 4.7.5 instead. I could not reproduce the issue so far there. > Thanks to whoever fixed it. :) The 4.7 stable tree contains a workaround rather than the full fix we would like to have in 4.9. So if you can then testing the current linux-next would be really appreciated. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org