From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754042AbcJEAK6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 20:10:58 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:57000 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751527AbcJEAK5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 20:10:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 20:10:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20161004.201051.821616397135404483.davem@davemloft.net> To: dhowells@redhat.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] rxrpc: More fixes and adjustments From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <10083.1475596890@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <20161003.020236.1905952240188445872.davem@davemloft.net> <147527161156.28826.2148784664652062075.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <10083.1475596890@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Tue, 04 Oct 2016 17:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Howells Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 17:01:30 +0100 > What's the procedure for sending more fixes at this point? Do I send them > against net-next, since net doesn't contain the things to be fixed yet, or do > I wait for net to catch up? I'm sending Linus a pull request later today for the stuff in net-next, and once he takes that all the trees will be synced up and you can start sending fixes. Thanks.