From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: RDMA developer gatherings around Kernel Summit and Linux Plumbers in Santa Fe Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 01:32:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20161005083218.GA16922@infradead.org> References: <20161004124513.GA12483@infradead.org> <7BAAE610-98A0-47FC-993B-77401AA32F4A@ornl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: "Atchley, Scott" , Christoph Hellwig , Linux RDMA Mailing List , "ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , Jason Gunthorpe , "john.fleck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , "leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , Doug Ledford , "Coulter, Susan K" , "shewa-YOWKrPYUwWM@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Could someone elaborate what the OFA position is? Right now the only thing I know is that they are a) forcing their members to Dual license code nd have b) some sort of weird idea that they could also force this on others in some way. I personally think that a) is not helpful to the adoption of RDMA technologies in Linux, and that b) is obviously a complete non-started as confirmed multiple times, which isn't just my own opinion. Based on that I really don't understand what the point of this discussion is, unless OFA really needs help with an internal discussion to get rid of a). If Christoph really wants me to help with a) please do it during Plumbers as I won't be around on Saturday. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html