From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756854AbcJGPYE (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:24:04 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:43237 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756749AbcJGPXX (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:23:23 -0400 Message-Id: <20161007150211.416377482@infradead.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.63-1 Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 16:52:51 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Linus Torvalds , Waiman Long , Jason Low , Ding Tianhong , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , Ingo Molnar , Imre Deak , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Davidlohr Bueso , Tim Chen , Terry Rudd , "Paul E. McKenney" , Jason Low , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Chris Wilson , Daniel Vetter , Waiman Long Subject: [PATCH -v4 8/8] locking/mutex: Enable optimistic spinning of woken waiter References: <20161007145243.361481786@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline; filename=waiman_long-locking_mutex-enable_optimistic_spinning_of_woken_waiter.patch Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Waiman Long This patch makes the waiter that sets the HANDOFF flag start spinning instead of sleeping until the handoff is complete or the owner sleeps. Otherwise, the handoff will cause the optimistic spinners to abort spinning as the handed-off owner may not be running. Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Tim Chen Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Imre Deak Cc: Jason Low Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Ding Tianhong Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) --- kernel/locking/mutex.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -416,24 +416,39 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owne * * Returns true when the lock was taken, otherwise false, indicating * that we need to jump to the slowpath and sleep. + * + * The waiter flag is set to true if the spinner is a waiter in the wait + * queue. The waiter-spinner will spin on the lock directly and concurrently + * with the spinner at the head of the OSQ, if present, until the owner is + * changed to itself. */ static bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct mutex *lock, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, const bool use_ww_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + const bool use_ww_ctx, const bool waiter) { struct task_struct *task = current; - if (!mutex_can_spin_on_owner(lock)) - goto done; + if (!waiter) { + /* + * The purpose of the mutex_can_spin_on_owner() function is + * to eliminate the overhead of osq_lock() and osq_unlock() + * in case spinning isn't possible. As a waiter-spinner + * is not going to take OSQ lock anyway, there is no need + * to call mutex_can_spin_on_owner(). + */ + if (!mutex_can_spin_on_owner(lock)) + goto fail; - /* - * In order to avoid a stampede of mutex spinners trying to - * acquire the mutex all at once, the spinners need to take a - * MCS (queued) lock first before spinning on the owner field. - */ - if (!osq_lock(&lock->osq)) - goto done; + /* + * In order to avoid a stampede of mutex spinners trying to + * acquire the mutex all at once, the spinners need to take a + * MCS (queued) lock first before spinning on the owner field. + */ + if (!osq_lock(&lock->osq)) + goto fail; + } - while (true) { + for (;;) { struct task_struct *owner; if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) { @@ -449,7 +464,7 @@ static bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct * performed the optimistic spinning cannot be done. */ if (READ_ONCE(ww->ctx)) - break; + goto fail_unlock; } /* @@ -457,15 +472,20 @@ static bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct * release the lock or go to sleep. */ owner = __mutex_owner(lock); - if (owner && !mutex_spin_on_owner(lock, owner)) - break; + if (owner) { + if (waiter && owner == task) { + smp_mb(); /* ACQUIRE */ + break; + } - /* Try to acquire the mutex if it is unlocked. */ - if (__mutex_trylock(lock, false)) { - osq_unlock(&lock->osq); - return true; + if (!mutex_spin_on_owner(lock, owner)) + goto fail_unlock; } + /* Try to acquire the mutex if it is unlocked. */ + if (__mutex_trylock(lock, waiter)) + break; + /* * The cpu_relax() call is a compiler barrier which forces * everything in this loop to be re-loaded. We don't need @@ -475,8 +495,17 @@ static bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct cpu_relax_lowlatency(); } - osq_unlock(&lock->osq); -done: + if (!waiter) + osq_unlock(&lock->osq); + + return true; + + +fail_unlock: + if (!waiter) + osq_unlock(&lock->osq); + +fail: /* * If we fell out of the spin path because of need_resched(), * reschedule now, before we try-lock the mutex. This avoids getting @@ -495,7 +524,8 @@ static bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct } #else static bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct mutex *lock, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, const bool use_ww_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + const bool use_ww_ctx, const bool waiter) { return false; } @@ -600,7 +630,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, mutex_acquire_nest(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, nest_lock, ip); if (__mutex_trylock(lock, false) || - mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, use_ww_ctx)) { + mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, use_ww_ctx, false)) { /* got the lock, yay! */ lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip); if (use_ww_ctx) @@ -669,7 +699,8 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, * state back to RUNNING and fall through the next schedule(), * or we must see its unlock and acquire. */ - if (__mutex_trylock(lock, first)) + if ((first && mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, use_ww_ctx, true)) || + __mutex_trylock(lock, first)) break; spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);