From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752164AbcJJM3M (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 08:29:12 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48162 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751500AbcJJM3K (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 08:29:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:29:17 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Rajneesh Bhardwaj , Darren Hart , Nicolai Stange , Vishwanath Somayaji , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] intel_pmc_core: avoid boot time warning for !CONFIG_DEBUGFS_FS Message-ID: <20161010122917.GA2377@kroah.com> References: <20161010111313.119658-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20161010111313.119658-2-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20161010111313.119658-2-arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 01:12:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > While looking at a patch that introduced a compile-time warning > "‘pmc_core_dev_state_get’ defined but not used" (I sent a patch > for debugfs to fix it), I noticed that the same patch caused > it in intel_pmc_core also introduced a bogus run-time warning: > "PMC Core: debugfs register failed". > > The problem is the IS_ERR_OR_NULL() check that as usual gets > things wrong: when CONFIG_DEBUGFS_FS is disabled, > debugfs_create_dir() fails with an error code, and we don't > need to warn about it, unlike the case in which it returns > NULL. > > This reverts the driver to the previous state of not warning > about CONFIG_DEBUGFS_FS being disabled. I chose not to > restore the driver to making a runtime error in debugfs > fatal in pmc_core_probe(). > > Fixes: df2294fb6428 ("intel_pmc_core: Convert to DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c > index 520b58a04daa..e8b1b836ca2d 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int pmc_core_dbgfs_register(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev) > struct dentry *dir, *file; > > dir = debugfs_create_dir("pmc_core", NULL); > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dir)) > + if (!dir) > return -ENOMEM; Hah, no, you shouldn't ever care about any return value being "wrong" from debugfs, the code should just continue on as normal. And yes, you are correct, the IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is totally wrong. thanks, greg k-h