From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buLyB-0005wD-CJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:01:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buLy5-0008GJ-B9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:01:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:01:06 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20161012160106.GP5544@noname.redhat.com> References: <1476171437-11830-1-git-send-email-ashijeetacharya@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1476171437-11830-1-git-send-email-ashijeetacharya@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Allow blockdev-add for SSH List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ashijeet Acharya Cc: rjones@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org Am 11.10.2016 um 09:37 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben: > This series adds blockdev-add support for SSH block driver. > > Patch 1 prepares the code for the addition of a new option prefix, > which is "server.". This is accomplished by adding a > ssh_has_filename_options_conflict() function which helps to iterate > over the various options and check for conflict. > > Patch 2 first adds InetSocketAddress compatibility to SSH block driver > and then makes it accept a InetSocketAddress under the "server" option. > The old options "host" and "port" are supported as legacy options and > then translated to the respective InetSocketAddress representation. > > Patch 3 drops the usage of "host" and "port" outside of > ssh_has_filename_options_conflict() and > ssh_process_legacy_socket_options() functions in order to make them > legacy options completely. > > Patch 4 helps to allow blockdev-add support for the SSH block driver > by making the SSH option available. Commented on patch 2, the rest looks good to me at first sight. Just curious, what kind of testing did you give the series? Kevin