From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757696AbcJRGlN (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:41:13 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:35812 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753482AbcJRGlM (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:41:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:41:19 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Eric Anholt Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Warren , Lee Jones , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Dom Cobley Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging/vchi: Fix build warnings when formatting pointers on aarch64. Message-ID: <20161018064119.GC7796@kroah.com> References: <20161017194406.1080-1-eric@anholt.net> <20161017194406.1080-3-eric@anholt.net> <20161017202834.GA30101@kroah.com> <87d1iyr1g3.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d1iyr1g3.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:38:20PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:44:03PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > >> The code was generally using "%x" to print and "(unsigned int)" to > >> cast the pointers, but we have %p for printing pointers in the same > >> format without any broken casts. > > > > I already did this work, it's all checked into my tree, and is in > > linux-next now. You were cc:ed on the patches as well. > > I actually haven't seen any of those messages about the patches. It > looks like it's actually that notmuch is still failing to parse some > mails (they apparently disagree with postfix on how maildir files should > be formatted, so they just drop some mail on the floor). > > I did check the staging-testing branch before I started, since that's > where things were last I knew, and didn't know it had moved to -next. But staging-testing has those fixes in it (it gets pulled into -next). So I don't see how we got out of sync here... thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:41:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/5] staging/vchi: Fix build warnings when formatting pointers on aarch64. In-Reply-To: <87d1iyr1g3.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> References: <20161017194406.1080-1-eric@anholt.net> <20161017194406.1080-3-eric@anholt.net> <20161017202834.GA30101@kroah.com> <87d1iyr1g3.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> Message-ID: <20161018064119.GC7796@kroah.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:38:20PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:44:03PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > >> The code was generally using "%x" to print and "(unsigned int)" to > >> cast the pointers, but we have %p for printing pointers in the same > >> format without any broken casts. > > > > I already did this work, it's all checked into my tree, and is in > > linux-next now. You were cc:ed on the patches as well. > > I actually haven't seen any of those messages about the patches. It > looks like it's actually that notmuch is still failing to parse some > mails (they apparently disagree with postfix on how maildir files should > be formatted, so they just drop some mail on the floor). > > I did check the staging-testing branch before I started, since that's > where things were last I knew, and didn't know it had moved to -next. But staging-testing has those fixes in it (it gets pulled into -next). So I don't see how we got out of sync here... thanks, greg k-h