All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Cc: Colin Vidal <colin@cvidal.org>,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	David Windsor <dave@progbits.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] RE: [RFC 1/2] Reordering / guard definition on atomic_*_wrap function in order to avoid implicitly defined / redefined error on them, when CONFIG_HARDENED_ATOMIC is unset.
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:31:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161019083110.GD6447@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41BE01A7@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:21:06AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Colin Vidal <colin@cvidal.org>

No changelog at all?

> ---
>  include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  include/linux/atomic.h            | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h b/include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h
> index 790cb00..94d712b 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,30 @@ typedef atomic_t atomic_long_wrap_t;
>  
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifndef CONFIG_HARDENED_ATOMIC
> +#define atomic_read_wrap(v) atomic_read(v) #define atomic_set_wrap(v, 
> +i) atomic_set((v), (i)) #define atomic_add_wrap(i, v) atomic_add((i), 
> +(v)) #define atomic_add_unless_wrap(v, i, j) atomic_add_unless((v), 
> +(i), (j)) #define atomic_sub_wrap(i, v) atomic_sub((i), (v)) #define 
> +atomic_inc_wrap(v) atomic_inc(v) #define atomic_inc_and_test_wrap(v) 
> +atomic_inc_and_test(v) #ifndef atomic_inc_return_wrap #define 
> +atomic_inc_return_wrap(v) atomic_inc_return(v) #endif #ifndef 
> +atomic_add_return_wrap #define atomic_add_return_wrap(i, v) 
> +atomic_add_return((i), (v)) #endif #define atomic_dec_wrap(v) 
> +atomic_dec(v) #ifndef atomic_xchg_wrap #define atomic_xchg_wrap(v, i) 
> +atomic_xchg((v), (i)) #endif #define atomic_long_inc_wrap(v) 
> +atomic_long_inc(v) #define atomic_long_dec_wrap(v) atomic_long_dec(v) 
> +#define atomic_long_xchg_wrap(v, n) atomic_long_xchg(v, n) #define 
> +atomic_long_cmpxchg_wrap(l, o, n) atomic_long_cmpxchg(l, o, n) #endif 
> +/* CONFIG_HARDENED_ATOMIC */

That doesn't look correct to me at all, does it to you?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-19  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-18 14:59 [kernel-hardening] [RFC 0/2] arm: implementation of HARDENED_ATOMIC Colin Vidal
2016-10-18 14:59 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC 1/2] Reordering / guard definition on atomic_*_wrap function in order to avoid implicitly defined / redefined error on them, when CONFIG_HARDENED_ATOMIC is unset Colin Vidal
2016-10-18 16:04   ` Vaishali Thakkar
2016-10-19  8:48     ` Colin Vidal
2016-10-19  8:21   ` [kernel-hardening] " Reshetova, Elena
2016-10-19  8:31     ` Greg KH [this message]
2016-10-19  8:58       ` Colin Vidal
2016-10-19  9:16         ` Greg KH
2016-10-18 14:59 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC 2/2] arm: implementation for HARDENED_ATOMIC Colin Vidal
2016-10-18 21:29   ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-10-19  8:45     ` Colin Vidal
2016-10-19 20:11       ` Kees Cook
2016-10-20  5:58         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-10-20  8:30           ` Colin Vidal
2016-10-25  9:18   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-10-25 15:02     ` Colin Vidal
2016-10-26  7:24       ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-10-26  8:20         ` Colin Vidal
2016-10-27 11:08           ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-27 21:37             ` Kees Cook
2016-10-27 13:24   ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-10-28  5:18     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-10-28  8:33     ` Colin Vidal
2016-10-28 10:20       ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-28 10:59         ` David Windsor
2016-10-21  7:47 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC 0/2] arm: implementation of HARDENED_ATOMIC AKASHI Takahiro
2016-10-27 10:32 ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-10-27 12:45   ` David Windsor
2016-10-27 13:53     ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-27 14:10       ` David Windsor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161019083110.GD6447@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=colin@cvidal.org \
    --cc=dave@progbits.org \
    --cc=ishkamiel@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.