From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Benc Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 9/9] openvswitch: use ipgre tunnel rather than gretap tunnel Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:58:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20161019185839.7c62183c@griffin> References: <4e5bfb307ee1e419f973a100e8acc7556311b64a.1476708213.git.jbenc@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers , ovs dev , Lorand Jakab , Simon Horman To: Pravin Shelar Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45972 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S941180AbcJSQ6n (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:58:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 22:14:06 -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote: > This is OVS tunnel compatibility code. We are not suppose to add new > features to compat code. Just provide a way to configure such device > over rtnl. Makes sense. Please consider this a test-only patch for now. I won't include it in v13. rtnetlink already supports configuration of such devices, I added that some time ago. We'll just need to make the user space aware of that. But at the kernel side, just dropping this patch is enough. Jiri