From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933537AbcJUO2I (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:28:08 -0400 Received: from mail.fireflyinternet.com ([109.228.58.192]:62938 "EHLO fireflyinternet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932814AbcJUO2G (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:28:06 -0400 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=78.156.65.138; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:27:57 +0100 From: Chris Wilson To: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Tvrtko Ursulin Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Use __sg_alloc_table_from_pages for allocating object backing store Message-ID: <20161021142757.GP25629@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Wilson , Tvrtko Ursulin , Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Tvrtko Ursulin References: <1477059083-3500-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> <1477059083-3500-5-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1477059083-3500-5-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 03:11:22PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > @@ -2236,18 +2233,16 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) > BUG_ON(obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS); > BUG_ON(obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS); > > - max_segment = swiotlb_max_size(); > - if (!max_segment) > - max_segment = rounddown(UINT_MAX, PAGE_SIZE); > - > - st = kmalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (st == NULL) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > page_count = obj->base.size / PAGE_SIZE; > - if (sg_alloc_table(st, page_count, GFP_KERNEL)) { > - kfree(st); > + pages = drm_malloc_gfp(page_count, sizeof(struct page *), > + GFP_TEMPORARY | __GFP_ZERO); > + if (!pages) > return -ENOMEM; Full circle! The whole reason this exists was to avoid that vmalloc. I don't really want it back... -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre