From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f44.google.com (mail-lf0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFC671AC1 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b81so177109016lfe.1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 21:36:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chargestorm-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:organization :user-agent; bh=ElnIheqOhaQIEn6RArsfpON+Z63bKhPCWN8oL47KgTU=; b=KrtIc81Qua9kE4hmDWLnJUt7HGDO6KBe24g46vz/yg9b2/4u2YIqGVZgc6RMndcN9R hlWRcw7B+ohRbG9k04/j0KQjEXQs4Vlfz7Q/+cgnCmAJlx1l45xr9Wk91GY1rXOFLw2l Ne641Uq518+Zk8i80hgrdhSOewTl+V8czReUO7mZP22wwIRqosRboVxfGYw6Eon+Vy1V jYSMMPCCQKXobB8/y7xY3mQXx+shOAUCqDESCkVLq5I7jfNxY4QGX5Uw9Ay2Zi0WPm8G E4LyPhzIh0ULrh5vvouBEnfV0ybxWAaduo/ofp1VO7Wf7eLVRjYKFHn19RWxeXa0XlmL 4pMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:organization:user-agent; bh=ElnIheqOhaQIEn6RArsfpON+Z63bKhPCWN8oL47KgTU=; b=htjlBfdISkbfeGg2GYbPQXxJbLLz2+W6GdMQcPSlrIZebjh/TQYdaOwYxrI0Uv2uLz FdYdZzJkkZg/ptoT5tWIqUYL6aat2aj34y0MdPnmv61g6ABIhfrqQ8vaEYMgOUdipbO0 SxNRzViRxwH+290zKUfXUj/M/XuZv7ku/eWNcoeAPRUJeWi2zWxjDvAuHbXut51TjhyP Z/yQuMhy/r7UNOxBSNEPlOT60uEnXoxY5fuQqJKaqvVD5AgnJu42nz/cRKOS/drcEgNB 5FvCSKhY8wFszyv42OwFrHMMJCcETMdCzFvqiWY+Mi2JiJVvLGO5S6+QHpmN2IRAht4O kY/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveZ3vOTgfqwE+oxnmxmow76E5sStEq9tlvH1KR0BvO880Y516KfJIyYweNL4YG7cg== X-Received: by 10.25.153.149 with SMTP id b143mr6228165lfe.150.1477283776902; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 21:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ad.chargestorm.se (h83-209-191-235.cust.se.alltele.net. [83.209.191.235]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h138sm2648747lfe.24.2016.10.23.21.36.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 21:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 06:36:14 +0200 From: Anders Darander To: "thilo.cestonaro@ts.fujitsu.com" Message-ID: <20161024043614.3gqmsqpu2h52tnpr@ad.chargestorm.se> Mail-Followup-To: "thilo.cestonaro@ts.fujitsu.com" , "raj.khem@gmail.com" , "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" References: <58072ca7.c70f420a.fed0f.74b1SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <432953B0-59CB-4E94-A670-C4BD4A12C88A@gmail.com> <1476944666.6754.1.camel@ts.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1476944666.6754.1.camel@ts.fujitsu.com> X-Accept-Language: sv, en, de X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5AF0 B2E9 78FE 9D75 D110 6F8F 3E31 84D7 920E 938C X-GPG-Key-Id: 0x920E938C X-GPG-Keyserver: hkp://keys.gnupg.net Organization: ChargeStorm AB User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-qt for specific image X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:36:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline * thilo.cestonaro@ts.fujitsu.com [161020 08:36]: > > what is the advantage of such a recipe? > The only "advantage" what made me using such a recipe was, that I want > to have the normal toolchain AND the qt5 toolchain in one installation > package together. When you know another way to get both together, I > would be thankful if you tell me how to do this. Well, have your image `inherit populate_sdk_qt5`, and then call `bitbake -c populate_sdk`. That'll give you the standard, image-based SDK, with Qt5 in it. Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander, Senior System Architect ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB