From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Bobroff Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:21:23 +1100 Subject: [Buildroot] Report from the Buildroot Meeting in Berlin In-Reply-To: <20161024092546.21e4dc0f@free-electrons.com> References: <20161019221035.2350c181@free-electrons.com> <20161024005421.GA2747@tungsten.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20161024092546.21e4dc0f@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20161025022123.GB8599@tungsten.ozlabs.ibm.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:25:46AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:54:23 +1100, Sam Bobroff wrote: > > > > - Improving the developer experience when using _OVERRIDE_SRCDIR or > > > "local" packages. Currently, since the source code is copied in the > > > build directory, the build errors and warnings refers to the build > > > directory. That's not convenient for users running an IDE, since > > > clicking on the warning or error does not bring to the correct > > > file. After much discusion, it appears that the only reasonable > > > solution is to implement per-package out-of-tree build. > > > > Great! Will this allow the use of --delete with the rsync that copies the > > source? (It would fix the problem caused by certain moved/renamed files in your > > source directory when using _OVERRIDE_SOURCEDIR.) > > Well, if we have per-package out-of-tree, then there is no rsync at all > anymore. The source code stays in the directory specified in > _OVERRIDE_SRCDIR, and only the build tree is in > output/build/-/. That is even better, from my point of view (as someone who uses buildroot as a cross-compilation development environment) :-) > However, this obviously works only for packages that use a sane build > system supporting out of tree build. > > Best regards, > > Thomas Cheers, Sam.