From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S941113AbcJYOFO (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:05:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58104 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753298AbcJYOFM (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:05:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:03:33 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Roman Pen Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kthread: allocate kthread structure using kmalloc Message-ID: <20161025140333.GB4326@redhat.com> References: <20161025110508.9052-1-roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161025110508.9052-1-roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/25, Roman Pen wrote: > > This patch avoids allocation of kthread structure on a stack, and simply > uses kmalloc. Oh. I didn't even read this patch, but I have to admit I personally do not like it. I can be wrong, but imo this is the step to the wrong direction. struct kthread is already bloated, we should not bloat it more. Instead we should kill it. And to_kthread() too, at least in its current form. For example. parked/exited/cpu should go into smp_hotplug_thread. Yes, this needs cleanups. All we need is kthread_data() which returns the pointer to the private data used by kthread. As for kthread_stop(), we no longer need to abuse ->vfork_done, we can use task_works: struct xxx { struct struct callback_head work; struct completion done; }; static void kthread_signal_exit(struct callback_head *arg) { struct xxx *xxx = container_of(arg); complete(xxx->done); } int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k) { struct xxx xxx; int ret; init_task_work(&xxx.work, kthread_signal_exit); init_completion(&xxx.done); trace_sched_kthread_stop(k); get_task_struct(k); if (!task_work_add(k, &xxx.work, false)) { set(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP); wake_up_process(k); wait_for_completion(&xxx.done); } ret = k->exit_code; put_task_struct(k); trace_sched_kthread_stop_ret(ret); return ret; } Oleg.