On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:37:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I think my patch (the version I sent) should ideally make it into > v4.9 as a bugfix. This was the powerpc warning I saw from Olof's > autobuilder with the -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning added back, and > it's one of the actual bugs I found (though rather unlikely > to hit in practice). > Merging with Heiner's patches should be trivial, and I'm pretty > sure we want the patch either way. Not sure if we need a backport, > it was introduced earlier this year in commit 6319a68011b8 > ("spi/fsl-espi: avoid infinite loops on fsl_espi_cpu_irq()") as > I now found. Sorry but I've lost track of which patches are being talked about here. If there's stuff for v4.9 can you send me a version that applies on Linus' tree and I'll merge that up into what's applied for -next?