From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S942644AbcJZM5M (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:57:12 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:49812 "EHLO metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966668AbcJZM5C (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:57:02 -0400 From: =?UTF-8?q?Uwe=20Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= To: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, Andy Whitcroft , Joe Perches Subject: [PATCH 0/5] print a hex number after a 0x prefix Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:56:53 +0200 Message-Id: <20161026125658.25728-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::7 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, these were found by git grep -i 0x%[lh]*[du] Maybe it would make sense to catch this type of unconvenience in checkpatch? Best regards Uwe Uwe Kleine-König (5): fs: exofs: print a hex number after a 0x prefix block: DAC960: print a hex number after a 0x prefix ipack: print a hex number after a 0x prefix misc: sgi-gru: print a hex number after a 0x prefix cris/arch-v32: cryptocop: print a hex number after a 0x prefix arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/cryptocop.c | 2 +- drivers/block/DAC960.c | 4 ++-- drivers/ipack/ipack.c | 2 +- drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grumain.c | 5 +++-- fs/exofs/dir.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.9.3