From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935249AbcJZUSg (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:18:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:36131 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933805AbcJZUSe (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:18:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:18:28 +0200 From: Richard Cochran To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: John Stultz , "Yann E. MORIN" , Michal Marek , Thomas Gleixner , Josh Triplett , Edward Cree , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] posix-timers: make it configurable Message-ID: <20161026201828.GA25143@localhost.localdomain> References: <1477448931-29051-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <1477448931-29051-6-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <20161026085102.GC11974@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:56:13AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > So if my Fedora usage doesn't need them, we can infer that > the number of embedded systems also not needing them might tend towards > a high percentage. (I wouldn't call Fedora an embedded distro, but heh...) > But let's be conservative and say "some". Sounds good to me. Thanks, Richard