All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH igt] intel-ci: CI is missing any wait tests in BAT
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:46:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161028104651.3zbuhnhpx3j43ned@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161013140043.14774-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 03:00:43PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Add the two basic gem_wait tests to the fast list, together they take a
> total of 1s (when correctly functioning).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> index f59ec98..853b911 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> @@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ igt@gem_sync@basic-store-each
>  igt@gem_tiled_blits@basic
>  igt@gem_tiled_fence_blits@basic
>  igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic
> +igt@gem_wait@basic-busy-all
> +igt@gem_wait@basic-wait-all
>  igt@gem_workarounds@basic-read
>  igt@gvt_basic@invalid-placeholder-test
>  igt@kms_addfb_basic@addfb25-bad-modifier
> -- 
> 2.9.3


In the future we will test new tests in the CI system. Unfortunately
the technology isn't there yet (tm) so this had to be tested
manually. Sorry for the delay.

For the record, the testing requirements for incoming new tests is
converging to:

- Tests must be stable. 1000 repeated runs with the new tests alone
  must give the same results. 10 repeated runs of modified BAT set
  must give the same results (excluding known issues in other tests).
- Tests must be fast. Full modified BAT run must not exceed the time
  budget.
- Tests must pass on current kernels, on some platform.

This will be documented when we can get CI do the testing for us on
multiple platforms and properly know what kind of requirements can
actually be tested.

For these tests, manual testing was done on IVB, HSW, and BYT. Stable,
fast and passing on all.


Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>

Please push.



--
Petri Latvala
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-28 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-13 14:00 [PATCH igt] intel-ci: CI is missing any wait tests in BAT Chris Wilson
2016-10-28 10:46 ` Petri Latvala [this message]
2016-10-28 20:30   ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161028104651.3zbuhnhpx3j43ned@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=petri.latvala@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.