From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S941352AbcJaL64 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:58:56 -0400 Received: from 7.mo177.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.61.149]:47359 "EHLO 7.mo177.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936182AbcJaL6y (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:58:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 12:58:31 +0100 From: Lukasz Majewski To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Boris Brezillon , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Bhuvanchandra DV , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Agner , Thierry Reding , kernel@pengutronix.de, Fabio Estevam , Philipp Zabel , Fabio Estevam , Lothar Wassmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] pwm: imx: Rewrite imx_pwm_*_v1 code to facilitate switch to atomic pwm operation Message-ID: <20161031125831.2c088b1d@jawa> In-Reply-To: <20161031092937.im5epytgorcd5fbm@pengutronix.de> References: <1477549785-4972-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@majess.pl> <1477549785-4972-4-git-send-email-l.majewski@majess.pl> <20161027094005.2da3b7d4@bbrezillon> <20161031055904.av45k535c26gjonz@pengutronix.de> <20161031092937.im5epytgorcd5fbm@pengutronix.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/ZPBf/r0GNdsJCvAJhuXXeTx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 3601190854333088400 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeelvddrjeelgdeffecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/ZPBf/r0GNdsJCvAJhuXXeTx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sascha, > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 06:59:04AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:40:05AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:29:39 +0200 > > > Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > >=20 > > > > The code has been rewritten to remove "generic" calls to > > > > imx_pwm_{enable|disable|config}. > > > >=20 > > > > Such approach would facilitate switch to atomic PWM (a.k.a > > > > ->apply()) implementation. > > > >=20 > > > > Suggested-by: Stefan Agner > > > > Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz > > > > Majewski --- > > > > Changes for v2: > > > > - Add missing clock unprepare for clk_ipg > > > > - Enable peripheral PWM clock (clk_per) > > > > --- > > > > drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 50 > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file > > > > changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > >=20 > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > > > > index ea3ce79..822eb5a 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > > > > @@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ struct imx_chip { > > > > static int imx_pwm_config_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, > > > > struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int > > > > period_ns) { > > > > - struct imx_chip *imx =3D to_imx_chip(chip); > > > > - > > > > /* > > > > * The PWM subsystem allows for exact frequencies. > > > > However, > > > > * I cannot connect a scope on my device to the PWM > > > > line and @@ -84,26 +82,56 @@ static int > > > > imx_pwm_config_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, > > > > * both the prescaler (/1 .. /128) and then by CLKSEL > > > > * (/2 .. /16). > > > > */ > > > > + struct imx_chip *imx =3D to_imx_chip(chip); > > > > u32 max =3D readl(imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMP); > > > > u32 p =3D max * duty_ns / period_ns; > > > > + int ret; > > > > + > > > > + ret =3D clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg); > > > > + if (ret) > > > > + return ret; > > > > + > > > > writel(max - p, imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMS); > > > > =20 > > > > + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_ipg); > > > > + > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > =20 > > > > -static void imx_pwm_set_enable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool > > > > enable) +static int imx_pwm_enable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, > > > > struct pwm_device *pwm) { > > > > struct imx_chip *imx =3D to_imx_chip(chip); > > > > + int ret; > > > > u32 val; > > > > =20 > > > > + ret =3D clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg); > > > > + if (ret) > > > > + return ret; > > > > + > > > > + ret =3D clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per); > > > > + if (ret) > > > > + return ret; > > > > + > > > > val =3D readl(imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); > > > > + val |=3D MX1_PWMC_EN; > > > > + writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); > > > > =20 > > > > - if (enable) > > > > - val |=3D MX1_PWMC_EN; > > > > - else > > > > - val &=3D ~MX1_PWMC_EN; > > > > + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_ipg); > > > > + > > > > + return 0; > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +static void imx_pwm_disable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct > > > > pwm_device *pwm) +{ > > > > + struct imx_chip *imx =3D to_imx_chip(chip); > > > > + u32 val; > > > > + > > > > + val =3D readl(imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); > > > > + val &=3D ~MX1_PWMC_EN; > > > > =20 > > > > writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); > > >=20 > > > Are you sure you don't need to enable the ipg clk when > > > manipulating the PWMC register? > > > If it's not needed here, then it's probably not needed in > > > imx_pwm_enable_v1() either. > >=20 > > As said, even the commit 7b27c160c68 introducing the register clk > > did not enable the clock consistently for all register accesses. > > Maybe it's best to include the following patch so that we can find > > a clear culprit and do not bury the ipg clock changes in larger > > patches. > >=20 > > Sascha > >=20 > > -----------------------------8<----------------------------------- > >=20 > > From 30b77e83269a58c2cb5ce6de8be647e027030d34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > > 2001 From: Sascha Hauer > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 06:45:33 +0100 > > Subject: [PATCH] pwm: imx: remove ipg clock > >=20 > > The use of the ipg clock was introduced with commit 7b27c160c6. In > > the commit message it was claimed that the ipg clock is enabled for > > register accesses. This is true for the ->config() callback, but > > not for the ->set_enable() callback. Given that the ipg clock is > > not consistently enabled for all register accesses we can assume > > that either it is not required at all or that the current code does > > not work. Remove the ipg clock code for now so that it's no longer > > in the way of refactoring the driver. >=20 > For reference: >=20 > I verified on i.MX53 and i.MX25 that the ipg clock provided to the pwm > driver is not needed when accessing registers. In the v3 of the patch series (almost done) I can confirm that i.MX6q works without ipg clock manipulation to access registers. > I would have to verify > that on i.MX27 aswell, but I do not have a board handy at the moment. >=20 > The current assumption as discussed by Philipp and me is that the ipg > clk is only needed when the pwm output is driven by the ipg clk > (MX3_PWMCR[16:17] =3D MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG) Interresting .... I must check if I'm able to test this on my (rather) not accessible HW. Best regards, =C5=81ukasz Majewski >=20 > Sascha >=20 --Sig_/ZPBf/r0GNdsJCvAJhuXXeTx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlgXMewACgkQf9/hG2YwgjHgZwCgpavytyZ3DVKi+KMXtaKXPxJO XJgAn0zDDqVcDEgDWiFA1w66WxRhXhZR =iROt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ZPBf/r0GNdsJCvAJhuXXeTx--