From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6329540F for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap.thunk.org (imap.thunk.org [74.207.234.97]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 924868C for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:56:17 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o To: Sergey Senozhatsky Message-ID: <20161031135617.bs7df7kur23gvm6b@thunk.org> References: <20160719034717.GA24189@swordfish> <20160921044156.GA486@swordfish> <20161031065435.GA458@swordfish> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161031065435.GA458@swordfish> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Tetsuo Handa , Viresh Kumar , James Bottomley , Tejun Heo , Jiri Kosina Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:54:35PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Any chance to do this session on Tuesday? > I prepared some slides; there are some patches circulating > and there are some things to discuss. Unless there are strong reasons why this needs to be done on Tuesday, my preference would be to try to schedule tech topics on Wednesday or Thursday. But sure, I'm happy to schedule such a topic if folks are interested. Let me know what your potential conflicts might be and/or a preferred time slot. Cheers, - Ted >