From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:52:05 +0000
Subject: MAINTAINERS entry for ARM/CLKDEV SUPPORT
In-Reply-To: <663e5d47-c2b5-c76f-01b4-0fb9a792acf6@codeaurora.org>
References: <20161010140810.GA30609@mwanda>
 <20161010141819.GA1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
 <20161026191938.GT4418@mwanda>
 <663e5d47-c2b5-c76f-01b4-0fb9a792acf6@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <20161031155204.GC1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 02:31:31PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/26/2016 12:19 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 03:18:19PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:08:10PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >>> Hello Stephen Boyd,
> >> Okay, that's really not nice.
> >>
> >> This is _not_ a question for Stephen.  Stephen does _not_ co-maintain
> >> clkdev or the clk API, but co-maintains CCF.  I've no idea why you are
> >> addressing this to Stephen when this is clearly a question for me to
> >> answer.
> >>
> > Sorry, I didn't mean to offend.  He's the one who deleted the clkdev.h
> > file though so I thought he might know if it should still be listed or
> > if it was gone for good.
> >
> 
> Yes, the arm version isn't coming back. We should delete
> arch/arm/include/asm/clkdev.h from the maintainers file and perhaps
> replace it with the asm-generic one.

I disagree.  See my reply to the original mail for the reasons.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.