From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964885AbcKOV6l (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:58:41 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.12]:55907 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753053AbcKOV6k (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:58:40 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:982:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3351:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:4470:5007:6261:7875:9040:10004:10400:10848:10967:11026:11232:11473:11658:11914:12740:12760:13069:13161:13229:13311:13357:13439:14181:14659:14721:21080:30041:30054:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:1,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: space07_112177a4c8947 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1592 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:58:36 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Daniel Vacek , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Tommaso Cucinotta , LKML , linux-rt-users , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: ??? Message-ID: <20161115165836.2202a9a6@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org What's with people sending out replies without subjects? On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:29:16 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > There is a deadlock, Peter!!! > > > > Describe please? Also, have you tried disabling RT_RUNTIME_SHARE ? > > > > > The description was given earlier in the the thread and the drawbacks of > using RT_RUNTIME_SHARE as well. Peter is saying to disable that, because of the drawbacks. I think the question is, do you still have a deadlock after disabling it? If not, then that's your solution. -- Steve