From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: make architecture specific hardware depend on the associated hardware Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:24:05 +0000 Message-ID: <20161121192405.isghvgat6yjavjgr@sirena.org.uk> References: <20161120175505.2910-1-pbrobinson@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="slbjbr7sk3d3eunu" Cc: linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Peter Robinson Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161120175505.2910-1-pbrobinson-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: --slbjbr7sk3d3eunu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 05:55:05PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > There's not much point enabling hardware specific hardware drivers if the > actual SoC architecture platforms aren't enabled as they're not much use > with out it. To repeat what I said last time please do make an effort to get this reviewed by the relevant driver maintainers. --slbjbr7sk3d3eunu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAABCAAGBQJYM0nUAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQbYMH/3nPcdfIdyCV3QTu1MY/rvuC 43n2GZ0M2iKtEnzPfsOPo+Y7tXAmwZ7F2UmT9xp82FpISVYLKh1WJIIgXSxAIlcr fAtbE+J6q6mufGeX3yUcoBAzFgYS6JU2Gqlos5txsdqLWo1W3N1+RlTpyhVie1sx QLss0Ounr/cCcxdjupEAQAsYMErBMxsQ55l+SrWCJw5wNlRSSA627yOhJaO/Wffs N7DEngSYHzdq/uB3YkT1XFQmiBqPOnsTfSqo4xKKAMUXBp8F4CBW2ISU8x29B4AE Xu91Bb1IymIzWVH88T7RVYnMjz+sdO55x05M2Mxe7Gft1BKX2N1bfzTreP/hwgI= =UJGy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --slbjbr7sk3d3eunu-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html