From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:33092 "EHLO mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755644AbcKVMeb (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:34:31 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f195.google.com with SMTP id 144so1358330pfv.0 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 04:34:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:26:12 +1000 From: Barry Day To: Jes Sorensen Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] rtl8xxxu: Pending patches Message-ID: <20161122122610.GA23278@testbox> (sfid-20161122_133443_816305_08EABB0F) References: <1479505468-29383-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <20161119014648.GA7140@testbox> <20161119023830.GA7324@testbox> <20161120024257.GA13169@testbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:59:47AM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Barry Day writes: > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 06:53:42PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote: > >> Barry Day writes: > >> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:00:10PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote: > >> >> Barry Day writes: > >> >> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:44:21PM -0500, Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com wrote: > >> >> >> From: Jes Sorensen > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Kalle, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Please find attached a number of patches for the rtl8xxxu > >> >> >> driver. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> The issues reported with wpa_supplicant on 8723bu still needs further > >> >> >> investigation. > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > The patch I posted that you want tested more will also fix the > >> >> > wpa_supplicant issue. Currently I'm looking at why the tx rate is not > >> >> > what it should be. I feel fixing that first will be beneficial for > >> >> > fixing any other issues. > >> >> > >> >> Interesting, I was thinking that might be the case. I do want to dig > >> >> into this further to understand it better. If we use your solution I > >> >> will want to make sure we cover both gen1 and gen2 parts. > >> >> > >> >> > The recent merge has made my local branch of rtl8xxxu-devel 14 > >> >> > commits ahead. > >> >> > Do I need to do a reset and submit a new patch for the DWA-131 dongle? > >> >> > >> >> In general you need to use 'git pull --rebase' on my tree. I rebase it > >> >> to stay in sync with Kalle's tree. > >> >> > >> >> The DWA-131 is the 8192eu? Sorry a bit behind and my mind is losing > >> >> bits. If it's the patch you posted earlier I can dig it out and play > >> >> with it - I am still catching up though, so please be patient. > >> > > >> > yes it's an 8192eu. > >> > >> Gotcha - how do you do your testing to reproduce the problem btw? Most > >> of my testing is using the 8723au as a primary device and the next > >> device as a follow-on, so I may not see as long a run with the device > >> active as you see. > >> > > > > Testing is simple. Connect to an AP in the usual > > manner..disconnect..reconnect. The 8192eu will fail to reconnect and > > John Heenan reported the 8723bu also fails to reconnect. Even though > > he was directly stopping and restarting wpa_supplicant, it's the same > > thing to the driver - connect..disconnect..reconnect. > > Thanks for the details - I'll have a look shortly. > > > With using a usb_device pointer, each message starts with the usb bus > > address. Plug it into a different port and that address could > > change. By using a pointer to the device associated with the wiphy > > each message will begin with the driver name. Just makes it easier for > > the average user to report what's in the log because he can just grep > > for "rtl8xxxu". > > I see - that would be problematic for me as I quite often have 3-4 of > these things plugged in at the same time. Not knowing which port spits > out the message would make it a lot harder to track. In fact my primary > devel box for this (Lenovo Yoga 13) has an rtl8723au soldered on the > motherboard, so the moment I plug in any other dongle I'll have two. > > The alternative would be to add a prefer to the individual messages. > > Cheers, > Jes I should have mentioned it also places the usb address after the driver name.