From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756218AbcKVQXK (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:23:10 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:38466 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755310AbcKVQXJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:23:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:22:51 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: maitysanchayan@gmail.com Cc: stefan@agner.ch, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20161122162251.x7uheu47426g3mpg@sirena.org.uk> References: <20161121191847.vg32cwople4qmini@sirena.org.uk> <20161121191430.GA24521@Sanchayan-Arch.localdomain> <20161121191850.GB24521@Sanchayan-Arch.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nytvzblbt3cd3hzr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161121191850.GB24521@Sanchayan-Arch.localdomain> X-Cookie: rugged, adj.: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f1d:6b5::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix SPI transfer issue when using multiple SPI_IOC_MESSAGE X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nytvzblbt3cd3hzr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:48:50AM +0530, maitysanchayan@gmail.com wrote: > On 16-11-22 00:44:30, maitysanchayan@gmail.com wrote: > > This is not a resend of an applied patch. The whole series applies on > > top of your topic/fsl-dspi branch and has fixes for the SPI DMA as > > incremental changes > Sorry. I take that back. I now see you applied the patch and I got the applied > mail after I replied. Ah, I did apply it on Friday but somehow it didn't get pushed until yesterday. Sorry for the confusion. --nytvzblbt3cd3hzr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAABCAAGBQJYNHDbAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQrxgH/RLG+gnz7Slh0yiS7NdIQ4oS o4LRHsk/jLv8MN0K8phvZxZV36N5JfainQOBGznf9O/Uw871ATDwiyDfF1ivRKC6 wipKzk6p1d3D4ef1CbrfdmQV+1C86tYQVXI3ZHXPgz6LadNXSxvfNNRNoFFtbZYV zNMpePkfPtW68596MChQZxCZnnoLK6ZzZrelFS/bXUaQw/Z/6wEBOekrYHYaNkX1 mZCZ5FKmn4Vfoje33eDMVNiVmUl1oK60Ugg59PPQPrfuZdS2k84hwxqjixwz1FU7 QTepgqnppDR8L+S/WSrskIsOfMmU2eF/qa63IeLtAG2lDp/enY9F4QZENi8+Dj8= =Pl+Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nytvzblbt3cd3hzr-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix SPI transfer issue when using multiple SPI_IOC_MESSAGE Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:22:51 +0000 Message-ID: <20161122162251.x7uheu47426g3mpg@sirena.org.uk> References: <20161121191847.vg32cwople4qmini@sirena.org.uk> <20161121191430.GA24521@Sanchayan-Arch.localdomain> <20161121191850.GB24521@Sanchayan-Arch.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nytvzblbt3cd3hzr" Cc: stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: maitysanchayan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161121191850.GB24521-2b/appYahYDPUjlVagVGR1Kr0EmMEXJSn9A1Ff6Mc9Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: --nytvzblbt3cd3hzr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:48:50AM +0530, maitysanchayan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: > On 16-11-22 00:44:30, maitysanchayan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: > > This is not a resend of an applied patch. The whole series applies on > > top of your topic/fsl-dspi branch and has fixes for the SPI DMA as > > incremental changes > Sorry. I take that back. I now see you applied the patch and I got the applied > mail after I replied. Ah, I did apply it on Friday but somehow it didn't get pushed until yesterday. Sorry for the confusion. --nytvzblbt3cd3hzr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAABCAAGBQJYNHDbAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQrxgH/RLG+gnz7Slh0yiS7NdIQ4oS o4LRHsk/jLv8MN0K8phvZxZV36N5JfainQOBGznf9O/Uw871ATDwiyDfF1ivRKC6 wipKzk6p1d3D4ef1CbrfdmQV+1C86tYQVXI3ZHXPgz6LadNXSxvfNNRNoFFtbZYV zNMpePkfPtW68596MChQZxCZnnoLK6ZzZrelFS/bXUaQw/Z/6wEBOekrYHYaNkX1 mZCZ5FKmn4Vfoje33eDMVNiVmUl1oK60Ugg59PPQPrfuZdS2k84hwxqjixwz1FU7 QTepgqnppDR8L+S/WSrskIsOfMmU2eF/qa63IeLtAG2lDp/enY9F4QZENi8+Dj8= =Pl+Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nytvzblbt3cd3hzr-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:22:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix SPI transfer issue when using multiple SPI_IOC_MESSAGE In-Reply-To: <20161121191850.GB24521@Sanchayan-Arch.localdomain> References: <20161121191847.vg32cwople4qmini@sirena.org.uk> <20161121191430.GA24521@Sanchayan-Arch.localdomain> <20161121191850.GB24521@Sanchayan-Arch.localdomain> Message-ID: <20161122162251.x7uheu47426g3mpg@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:48:50AM +0530, maitysanchayan at gmail.com wrote: > On 16-11-22 00:44:30, maitysanchayan at gmail.com wrote: > > This is not a resend of an applied patch. The whole series applies on > > top of your topic/fsl-dspi branch and has fixes for the SPI DMA as > > incremental changes > Sorry. I take that back. I now see you applied the patch and I got the applied > mail after I replied. Ah, I did apply it on Friday but somehow it didn't get pushed until yesterday. Sorry for the confusion. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: not available URL: