From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756502AbcKVQkq (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:40:46 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:39344 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756485AbcKVQko (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:40:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:40:28 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Axel Haslam Cc: Leanne Girdwood , Kevin Hilman , Sekhar Nori , David Lechner , robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20161122164028.ghwtxgmx7vlr6edy@sirena.org.uk> References: <20161104213536.28496-1-ahaslam@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bvlrguzkjy26ywzs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: rugged, adj.: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f1d:6b5::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] regulator: handling of error conditions for usb drivers X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --bvlrguzkjy26ywzs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Axel Haslam wrote: > im wondering if you have these 2 patches in queue, > if there are no objections would it be possible to take them? Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. --bvlrguzkjy26ywzs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAABCAAGBQJYNHT7AAoJECTWi3JdVIfQI98IAICsrqxzQ5NLb/U/lssdMybA gPOjnRGr/sfe6qFVYzthJIp1ZNmrlbxjP1+XtJqvFo8nWVghaFYkRA7WUOQxpVAJ Wq7NA8mnbN0GRvWsQhJoINbWvEVjwc9uOVNPICMT0lODnAhiltT2AKGRBF8qgCX4 7Rg4FKkBTZi553z80BlMX1mmA8O+eAonpcuWtzNML7Ld8Zu+xt4X6PKyZSsLHbiz p98YD4oMpVXSEDnjt7n4K1UKfb+0yKUVuD5ijtgOcBCG8JADmJ641JG16aktIIDf nK+M1VFL1ffNruhzhzXiVLeu9yCs4QrK8hHKczNgz4wwAxh3ssD7hGZ7ToD7rFQ= =8xcb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bvlrguzkjy26ywzs--