All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Luwei Kang" <luwei.kang@intel.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:56:41 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161128145641.24d1cd60@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:

  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c

between commit:

  c592b5734706 ("x86/fpu: Remove use_eager_fpu()")

from the tip tree and commit:

  4504b5c9414c ("kvm: x86: Add AVX512_4VNNIW and AVX512_4FMAPS support")

from the kvm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index 0aefb626fa8f,25f0f15fab1a..000000000000
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@@ -16,6 -16,8 +16,7 @@@
  #include <linux/export.h>
  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
+ #include <asm/processor.h>
 -#include <asm/fpu/internal.h> /* For use_eager_fpu.  Ugh! */
  #include <asm/user.h>
  #include <asm/fpu/xstate.h>
  #include "cpuid.h"

             reply	other threads:[~2016-11-28  3:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-28  3:56 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-18  0:32 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-01  0:18 Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-01  0:14 Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-15 23:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-10  2:16 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-10  2:28 ` Like Xu
2021-12-13 17:46 broonie
2021-12-13 18:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 18:23 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-25  5:11 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-21  2:39 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-21 15:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-22  4:30 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-22  4:45 ` Nadav Amit
2021-04-22  4:58   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-22  6:29   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-29  6:47 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-17  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-02  4:53 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-04  3:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-16  2:48 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-19  4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-17  5:22 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-19  3:25 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-08  3:54 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15  4:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06  5:12 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06  6:27 ` Tianyu Lan
2018-02-02  0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-15  2:39 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-28  4:52 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04  6:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-25  4:39 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-25  6:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-25 13:57   ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-25 16:53     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-25 20:05       ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-25 20:41         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-25 20:42           ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-26  7:24             ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-17  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-17  7:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-17 21:31   ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-12  2:54 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-12  2:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-19  4:59 Michael Ellerman
2015-05-26  4:45 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-30  4:26 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-16  7:14 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-16  7:53 ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161128145641.24d1cd60@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=luwei.kang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.