From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754990AbcK2LZN (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:25:13 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:35894 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753819AbcK2LYv (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:24:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:24:46 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Ross Zwisler , Matthew Wilcox , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A . Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/33] Radix tree patches for 4.10 Message-ID: <20161129112446.GA8837@node.shutemov.name> References: <1480369871-5271-1-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1480369871-5271-1-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:50:04PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > Hi Andrew, > > Please include these patches in the -mm tree for 4.10. Mostly these > are improvements; the only bug fixes in here relate to multiorder > entries (which are unused in the 4.9 tree). The IDR rewrite has the > highest potential for causing mayhem as the test suite is quite spartan. > We have an Outreachy intern scheduled to work on the test suite for the > 2016 winter season, so hopefully it will improve soon. > > I did not include Konstantin's suggested change to the API for > radix_tree_iter_resume(). Many of the callers do not currently care > about the size of the entry they are consuming, and determining that > information is not always trivial. Since this is not a performance > critical API (it's called when we've paused iterating through a tree > in order to schedule for a higher priority task), I think it's more > important to have a simpler interface. > > I'd like to thank Kiryl for all the testing he's been doing. He's found > at least two bugs which weren't related to the API extensions that he > really wanted from this patch set. Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov I would like to get in as my ext4 patchset depends on this. -- Kirill A. Shutemov From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:24:46 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Ross Zwisler , Matthew Wilcox , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A . Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/33] Radix tree patches for 4.10 Message-ID: <20161129112446.GA8837@node.shutemov.name> References: <1480369871-5271-1-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1480369871-5271-1-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:50:04PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > Hi Andrew, > > Please include these patches in the -mm tree for 4.10. Mostly these > are improvements; the only bug fixes in here relate to multiorder > entries (which are unused in the 4.9 tree). The IDR rewrite has the > highest potential for causing mayhem as the test suite is quite spartan. > We have an Outreachy intern scheduled to work on the test suite for the > 2016 winter season, so hopefully it will improve soon. > > I did not include Konstantin's suggested change to the API for > radix_tree_iter_resume(). Many of the callers do not currently care > about the size of the entry they are consuming, and determining that > information is not always trivial. Since this is not a performance > critical API (it's called when we've paused iterating through a tree > in order to schedule for a higher priority task), I think it's more > important to have a simpler interface. > > I'd like to thank Kiryl for all the testing he's been doing. He's found > at least two bugs which weren't related to the API extensions that he > really wanted from this patch set. Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov I would like to get in as my ext4 patchset depends on this. -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org