locking: Add kselftests for ww_mutex

locking: Add kselftests for ww_mutex

[Chris Wilson]

Nicolai Hähnle was looking into a deadlock within ww_mutexes (that has
been fixed by Peter's mutex rewrite) and to support his changes, I
thought it was be useful to have a small validation suite for ww_mutex.
-Chris

[PATCH v2 1/8] locking: Fix compilation of __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER

[Chris Wilson]

>From conflicting macro parameters, passing the wrong name to
__MUTEX_INITIALIZER and a stray '\', #define __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER was
very unhappy.

One unnecessary change was to choose to pass &ww_class instead of
implicitly taking the address of the class within the macro.

Fixes: 1b375dc30710 ("mutex: Move ww_mutex definitions to ww_mutex.h")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
index 2bb5deb0012e..941df8c8b90e 100644
--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ struct ww_mutex {
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, ww_class) \
-		, .ww_class = &ww_class
+# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) \
+		, .ww_class = class
 #else
-# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, ww_class)
+# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class)
 #endif
 
 #define __WW_CLASS_INITIALIZER(ww_class) \
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct ww_mutex {
 		, .mutex_name = #ww_class "_mutex" }
 
 #define __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) \
-		{ .base = { \__MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) } \
+		{ .base =  __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname.base) \
 		__WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) }
 
 #define DEFINE_WW_CLASS(classname) \
-- 
2.10.2

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] locking: Fix compilation of __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER

[Peter Zijlstra]

Chris, did this series at all depend on the other ww_mutex patches?

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] locking: Fix compilation of __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER

[Chris Wilson]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:50:40PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> 
> Chris, did this series at all depend on the other ww_mutex patches?

It is independent. My goal was to try and hit the bugs Nicolai reported.
Most of it should be covered by locktorture if we add ww_mutex support
to it.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

[tip:locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Fix compilation of __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER

[tip-bot for Chris Wilson]

Commit-ID:  af2e859edd477fa1ea3d1d106f41a595cff3d162
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/af2e859edd477fa1ea3d1d106f41a595cff3d162
Author:     Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
AuthorDate: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:47:04 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:37:13 +0100

locking/ww_mutex: Fix compilation of __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER

>From conflicting macro parameters, passing the wrong name to
__MUTEX_INITIALIZER and a stray '\', #define __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER was
very unhappy.

One unnecessary change was to choose to pass &ww_class instead of
implicitly taking the address of the class within the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 1b375dc30710 ("mutex: Move ww_mutex definitions to ww_mutex.h")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161201114711.28697-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
index c075285..083950f 100644
--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ struct ww_mutex {
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, ww_class) \
-		, .ww_class = &ww_class
+# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) \
+		, .ww_class = class
 #else
-# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, ww_class)
+# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class)
 #endif
 
 #define __WW_CLASS_INITIALIZER(ww_class) \
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct ww_mutex {
 		, .mutex_name = #ww_class "_mutex" }
 
 #define __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) \
-		{ .base = { \__MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) } \
+		{ .base =  __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname.base) \
 		__WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) }
 
 #define DEFINE_WW_CLASS(classname) \

[PATCH v2 2/8] locking: Add ww_mutex to locktorture test

[Chris Wilson]

Although ww_mutexes degenerate into mutexes, it would be useful to
torture the deadlock handling between multiple ww_mutexes in addition to
torturing the regular mutexes.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/locking/locktorture.c                       | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST       |  1 +
 .../selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07       |  6 ++
 .../selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07.boot  |  1 +
 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07.boot

diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index f8c5af52a131..9bffedd82884 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -372,6 +372,78 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops mutex_lock_ops = {
 	.name		= "mutex_lock"
 };
 
+#include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
+static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(torture_ww_class);
+static DEFINE_WW_MUTEX(torture_ww_mutex_0, &torture_ww_class);
+static DEFINE_WW_MUTEX(torture_ww_mutex_1, &torture_ww_class);
+static DEFINE_WW_MUTEX(torture_ww_mutex_2, &torture_ww_class);
+
+static int torture_ww_mutex_lock(void)
+__acquires(torture_ww_mutex_0)
+__acquires(torture_ww_mutex_1)
+__acquires(torture_ww_mutex_2)
+{
+	LIST_HEAD(list);
+	struct reorder_lock {
+		struct list_head link;
+		struct ww_mutex *lock;
+	} locks[3], *ll, *ln;
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+
+	locks[0].lock = &torture_ww_mutex_0;
+	list_add(&locks[0].link, &list);
+
+	locks[1].lock = &torture_ww_mutex_1;
+	list_add(&locks[1].link, &list);
+
+	locks[2].lock = &torture_ww_mutex_2;
+	list_add(&locks[2].link, &list);
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &torture_ww_class);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(ll, &list, link) {
+		int err;
+
+		err = ww_mutex_lock(ll->lock, &ctx);
+		if (!err)
+			continue;
+
+		ln = ll;
+		list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(ln, &list, link)
+			ww_mutex_unlock(ln->lock);
+
+		if (err != -EDEADLK)
+			return err;
+
+		ww_mutex_lock_slow(ll->lock, &ctx);
+		list_move(&ll->link, &list);
+	}
+
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void torture_ww_mutex_unlock(void)
+__releases(torture_ww_mutex_0)
+__releases(torture_ww_mutex_1)
+__releases(torture_ww_mutex_2)
+{
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&torture_ww_mutex_0);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&torture_ww_mutex_1);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&torture_ww_mutex_2);
+}
+
+static struct lock_torture_ops ww_mutex_lock_ops = {
+	.writelock	= torture_ww_mutex_lock,
+	.write_delay	= torture_mutex_delay,
+	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.writeunlock	= torture_ww_mutex_unlock,
+	.readlock       = NULL,
+	.read_delay     = NULL,
+	.readunlock     = NULL,
+	.name		= "ww_mutex_lock"
+};
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
 static DEFINE_RT_MUTEX(torture_rtmutex);
 
@@ -793,6 +865,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 		&spin_lock_ops, &spin_lock_irq_ops,
 		&rw_lock_ops, &rw_lock_irq_ops,
 		&mutex_lock_ops,
+		&ww_mutex_lock_ops,
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
 		&rtmutex_lock_ops,
 #endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST
index b9611c523723..41bae5824339 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ LOCK03
 LOCK04
 LOCK05
 LOCK06
+LOCK07
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1d1da1477fc3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+CONFIG_SMP=y
+CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4
+CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
+CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=n
+CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=n
+CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07.boot b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07.boot
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..97dadd1a9e45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07.boot
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+locktorture.torture_type=ww_mutex_lock
-- 
2.10.2

[tip:locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Add ww_mutex to locktorture test

[tip-bot for Chris Wilson]

Commit-ID:  0186a6cbdc6287fde65858e5d9c714dc167b8ace
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/0186a6cbdc6287fde65858e5d9c714dc167b8ace
Author:     Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
AuthorDate: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:47:05 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:37:14 +0100

locking/ww_mutex: Add ww_mutex to locktorture test

Although ww_mutexes degenerate into mutexes, it would be useful to
torture the deadlock handling between multiple ww_mutexes in addition to
torturing the regular mutexes.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161201114711.28697-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/locktorture.c                       | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST       |  1 +
 .../rcutorture/configs/lock/{LOCK06 => LOCK07}     |  0
 .../selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07.boot  |  1 +
 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index f8c5af5..9bffedd 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -372,6 +372,78 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops mutex_lock_ops = {
 	.name		= "mutex_lock"
 };
 
+#include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
+static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(torture_ww_class);
+static DEFINE_WW_MUTEX(torture_ww_mutex_0, &torture_ww_class);
+static DEFINE_WW_MUTEX(torture_ww_mutex_1, &torture_ww_class);
+static DEFINE_WW_MUTEX(torture_ww_mutex_2, &torture_ww_class);
+
+static int torture_ww_mutex_lock(void)
+__acquires(torture_ww_mutex_0)
+__acquires(torture_ww_mutex_1)
+__acquires(torture_ww_mutex_2)
+{
+	LIST_HEAD(list);
+	struct reorder_lock {
+		struct list_head link;
+		struct ww_mutex *lock;
+	} locks[3], *ll, *ln;
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+
+	locks[0].lock = &torture_ww_mutex_0;
+	list_add(&locks[0].link, &list);
+
+	locks[1].lock = &torture_ww_mutex_1;
+	list_add(&locks[1].link, &list);
+
+	locks[2].lock = &torture_ww_mutex_2;
+	list_add(&locks[2].link, &list);
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &torture_ww_class);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(ll, &list, link) {
+		int err;
+
+		err = ww_mutex_lock(ll->lock, &ctx);
+		if (!err)
+			continue;
+
+		ln = ll;
+		list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(ln, &list, link)
+			ww_mutex_unlock(ln->lock);
+
+		if (err != -EDEADLK)
+			return err;
+
+		ww_mutex_lock_slow(ll->lock, &ctx);
+		list_move(&ll->link, &list);
+	}
+
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void torture_ww_mutex_unlock(void)
+__releases(torture_ww_mutex_0)
+__releases(torture_ww_mutex_1)
+__releases(torture_ww_mutex_2)
+{
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&torture_ww_mutex_0);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&torture_ww_mutex_1);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&torture_ww_mutex_2);
+}
+
+static struct lock_torture_ops ww_mutex_lock_ops = {
+	.writelock	= torture_ww_mutex_lock,
+	.write_delay	= torture_mutex_delay,
+	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.writeunlock	= torture_ww_mutex_unlock,
+	.readlock       = NULL,
+	.read_delay     = NULL,
+	.readunlock     = NULL,
+	.name		= "ww_mutex_lock"
+};
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
 static DEFINE_RT_MUTEX(torture_rtmutex);
 
@@ -793,6 +865,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 		&spin_lock_ops, &spin_lock_irq_ops,
 		&rw_lock_ops, &rw_lock_irq_ops,
 		&mutex_lock_ops,
+		&ww_mutex_lock_ops,
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
 		&rtmutex_lock_ops,
 #endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST
index b9611c5..41bae58 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ LOCK03
 LOCK04
 LOCK05
 LOCK06
+LOCK07
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK06 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07
similarity index 100%
copy from tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK06
copy to tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07.boot b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07.boot
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..97dadd1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK07.boot
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+locktorture.torture_type=ww_mutex_lock

[PATCH v2 3/8] locking: Begin kselftests for ww_mutex

[Chris Wilson]

v2: Add a couple more variations for degenerate ww_mutex, decrease
timeouts

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/locking/Makefile        |   1 +
 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/Kconfig.debug              |  12 ++++
 3 files changed, 153 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c

diff --git a/kernel/locking/Makefile b/kernel/locking/Makefile
index 6f88e352cd4f..760158d9d98d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/locking/Makefile
@@ -28,3 +28,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK) += rwsem-spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM) += rwsem-xadd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QUEUED_RWLOCKS) += qrwlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_LOCK_TORTURE_TEST) += locktorture.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_WW_MUTEX_SELFTEST) += test-ww_mutex.o
diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..472d5b1f303f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+/*
+ * Module-based API test facility for ww_mutexes
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, you can access it online at
+ * http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+
+#include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
+
+static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(ww_class);
+
+struct test_mutex {
+	struct work_struct work;
+	struct ww_mutex mutex;
+	struct completion ready, go, done;
+	unsigned int flags;
+};
+
+#define TEST_MTX_SPIN BIT(0)
+#define TEST_MTX_TRY BIT(1)
+#define TEST_MTX_CTX BIT(2)
+#define __TEST_MTX_LAST BIT(3)
+
+static void test_mutex_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct test_mutex *mtx = container_of(work, typeof(*mtx), work);
+
+	complete(&mtx->ready);
+	wait_for_completion(&mtx->go);
+
+	if (mtx->flags & TEST_MTX_TRY) {
+		while (!ww_mutex_trylock(&mtx->mutex))
+			cpu_relax();
+	} else {
+		ww_mutex_lock(&mtx->mutex, NULL);
+	}
+	complete(&mtx->done);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&mtx->mutex);
+}
+
+static int __test_mutex(unsigned int flags)
+{
+#define TIMEOUT (HZ / 16)
+	struct test_mutex mtx;
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int ret;
+
+	ww_mutex_init(&mtx.mutex, &ww_class);
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+
+	INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&mtx.work, test_mutex_work);
+	init_completion(&mtx.ready);
+	init_completion(&mtx.go);
+	init_completion(&mtx.done);
+	mtx.flags = flags;
+
+	schedule_work(&mtx.work);
+
+	wait_for_completion(&mtx.ready);
+	ww_mutex_lock(&mtx.mutex, (flags & TEST_MTX_CTX) ? &ctx : NULL);
+	complete(&mtx.go);
+	if (flags & TEST_MTX_SPIN) {
+		unsigned long timeout = jiffies + TIMEOUT;
+
+		ret = 0;
+		do {
+			if (completion_done(&mtx.done)) {
+				ret = -EINVAL;
+				break;
+			}
+			cpu_relax();
+		} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
+	} else {
+		ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&mtx.done, TIMEOUT);
+	}
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&mtx.mutex);
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+	if (ret) {
+		pr_err("%s(flags=%x): mutual exclusion failure\n",
+		       __func__, flags);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	flush_work(&mtx.work);
+	destroy_work_on_stack(&mtx.work);
+	return ret;
+#undef TIMEOUT
+}
+
+static int test_mutex(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < __TEST_MTX_LAST; i++) {
+		ret = __test_mutex(i);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = test_mutex();
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void __exit test_ww_mutex_exit(void)
+{
+}
+
+module_init(test_ww_mutex_init);
+module_exit(test_ww_mutex_exit);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index a6c8db1d62f6..cf8f3e942b46 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1161,6 +1161,18 @@ config LOCK_TORTURE_TEST
 	  Say M if you want these torture tests to build as a module.
 	  Say N if you are unsure.
 
+config WW_MUTEX_SELFTEST
+	tristate "Wait/wound mutex selftests"
+	help
+	  This option provides a kernel module that runs tests on the
+	  on the struct ww_mutex locking API.
+
+	  It is recommended to enable DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH in conjunction
+	  with this test harness.
+
+	  Say M if you want these self tests to build as a module.
+	  Say N if you are unsure.
+
 endmenu # lock debugging
 
 config TRACE_IRQFLAGS
-- 
2.10.2

[tip:locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Begin kselftests for ww_mutex

[tip-bot for Chris Wilson]

Commit-ID:  f2a5fec17395f259d54daa8833d81b00cceb15c3
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/f2a5fec17395f259d54daa8833d81b00cceb15c3
Author:     Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
AuthorDate: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:47:06 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:37:14 +0100

locking/ww_mutex: Begin kselftests for ww_mutex

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161201114711.28697-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/Makefile        |   1 +
 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/Kconfig.debug              |  12 ++++
 3 files changed, 153 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/Makefile b/kernel/locking/Makefile
index 6f88e35..760158d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/locking/Makefile
@@ -28,3 +28,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK) += rwsem-spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM) += rwsem-xadd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QUEUED_RWLOCKS) += qrwlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_LOCK_TORTURE_TEST) += locktorture.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_WW_MUTEX_SELFTEST) += test-ww_mutex.o
diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..472d5b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+/*
+ * Module-based API test facility for ww_mutexes
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, you can access it online at
+ * http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+
+#include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
+
+static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(ww_class);
+
+struct test_mutex {
+	struct work_struct work;
+	struct ww_mutex mutex;
+	struct completion ready, go, done;
+	unsigned int flags;
+};
+
+#define TEST_MTX_SPIN BIT(0)
+#define TEST_MTX_TRY BIT(1)
+#define TEST_MTX_CTX BIT(2)
+#define __TEST_MTX_LAST BIT(3)
+
+static void test_mutex_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct test_mutex *mtx = container_of(work, typeof(*mtx), work);
+
+	complete(&mtx->ready);
+	wait_for_completion(&mtx->go);
+
+	if (mtx->flags & TEST_MTX_TRY) {
+		while (!ww_mutex_trylock(&mtx->mutex))
+			cpu_relax();
+	} else {
+		ww_mutex_lock(&mtx->mutex, NULL);
+	}
+	complete(&mtx->done);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&mtx->mutex);
+}
+
+static int __test_mutex(unsigned int flags)
+{
+#define TIMEOUT (HZ / 16)
+	struct test_mutex mtx;
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int ret;
+
+	ww_mutex_init(&mtx.mutex, &ww_class);
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+
+	INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&mtx.work, test_mutex_work);
+	init_completion(&mtx.ready);
+	init_completion(&mtx.go);
+	init_completion(&mtx.done);
+	mtx.flags = flags;
+
+	schedule_work(&mtx.work);
+
+	wait_for_completion(&mtx.ready);
+	ww_mutex_lock(&mtx.mutex, (flags & TEST_MTX_CTX) ? &ctx : NULL);
+	complete(&mtx.go);
+	if (flags & TEST_MTX_SPIN) {
+		unsigned long timeout = jiffies + TIMEOUT;
+
+		ret = 0;
+		do {
+			if (completion_done(&mtx.done)) {
+				ret = -EINVAL;
+				break;
+			}
+			cpu_relax();
+		} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
+	} else {
+		ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&mtx.done, TIMEOUT);
+	}
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&mtx.mutex);
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+	if (ret) {
+		pr_err("%s(flags=%x): mutual exclusion failure\n",
+		       __func__, flags);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	flush_work(&mtx.work);
+	destroy_work_on_stack(&mtx.work);
+	return ret;
+#undef TIMEOUT
+}
+
+static int test_mutex(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < __TEST_MTX_LAST; i++) {
+		ret = __test_mutex(i);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = test_mutex();
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void __exit test_ww_mutex_exit(void)
+{
+}
+
+module_init(test_ww_mutex_init);
+module_exit(test_ww_mutex_exit);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index eb9e9a7..5b37821 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1180,6 +1180,18 @@ config LOCK_TORTURE_TEST
 	  Say M if you want these torture tests to build as a module.
 	  Say N if you are unsure.
 
+config WW_MUTEX_SELFTEST
+	tristate "Wait/wound mutex selftests"
+	help
+	  This option provides a kernel module that runs tests on the
+	  on the struct ww_mutex locking API.
+
+	  It is recommended to enable DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH in conjunction
+	  with this test harness.
+
+	  Say M if you want these self tests to build as a module.
+	  Say N if you are unsure.
+
 endmenu # lock debugging
 
 config TRACE_IRQFLAGS

[PATCH v2 4/8] locking: Add kselftests for ww_mutex AA deadlock detection

[Chris Wilson]

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
index 472d5b1f303f..835fa7a1036e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -118,6 +118,41 @@ static int test_mutex(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int test_aa(void)
+{
+	struct ww_mutex mutex;
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int ret;
+
+	ww_mutex_init(&mutex, &ww_class);
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+
+	ww_mutex_lock(&mutex, &ctx);
+
+	if (ww_mutex_trylock(&mutex))  {
+		pr_err("%s: trylocked itself!\n", __func__);
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = ww_mutex_lock(&mutex, &ctx);
+	if (ret != -EALREADY) {
+		pr_err("%s: missed deadlock for recursing, ret=%d\n",
+		       __func__, ret);
+		if (!ret)
+			ww_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = 0;
+out:
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -126,6 +161,10 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = test_aa();
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.10.2

[tip:locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Add kselftests for ww_mutex AA deadlock detection

[tip-bot for Chris Wilson]

Commit-ID:  c22fb3807fd0a3bdd98c13c4d2190ab064e6c09d
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/c22fb3807fd0a3bdd98c13c4d2190ab064e6c09d
Author:     Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
AuthorDate: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:47:07 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:37:15 +0100

locking/ww_mutex: Add kselftests for ww_mutex AA deadlock detection

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161201114711.28697-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
index 472d5b1..835fa7a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -118,6 +118,41 @@ static int test_mutex(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int test_aa(void)
+{
+	struct ww_mutex mutex;
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int ret;
+
+	ww_mutex_init(&mutex, &ww_class);
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+
+	ww_mutex_lock(&mutex, &ctx);
+
+	if (ww_mutex_trylock(&mutex))  {
+		pr_err("%s: trylocked itself!\n", __func__);
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = ww_mutex_lock(&mutex, &ctx);
+	if (ret != -EALREADY) {
+		pr_err("%s: missed deadlock for recursing, ret=%d\n",
+		       __func__, ret);
+		if (!ret)
+			ww_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = 0;
+out:
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -126,6 +161,10 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = test_aa();
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 

[PATCH v2 5/8] locking: Add kselftests for ww_mutex ABBA deadlock detection

[Chris Wilson]

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
index 835fa7a1036e..5a643ba2b020 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -153,6 +153,96 @@ static int test_aa(void)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+struct test_abba {
+	struct work_struct work;
+	struct ww_mutex a_mutex;
+	struct ww_mutex b_mutex;
+	struct completion a_ready;
+	struct completion b_ready;
+	bool resolve;
+	int result;
+};
+
+static void test_abba_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct test_abba *abba = container_of(work, typeof(*abba), work);
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int err;
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+	ww_mutex_lock(&abba->b_mutex, &ctx);
+
+	complete(&abba->b_ready);
+	wait_for_completion(&abba->a_ready);
+
+	err = ww_mutex_lock(&abba->a_mutex, &ctx);
+	if (abba->resolve && err == -EDEADLK) {
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&abba->b_mutex);
+		ww_mutex_lock_slow(&abba->a_mutex, &ctx);
+		err = ww_mutex_lock(&abba->b_mutex, &ctx);
+	}
+
+	if (!err)
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&abba->a_mutex);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&abba->b_mutex);
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+	abba->result = err;
+}
+
+static int test_abba(bool resolve)
+{
+	struct test_abba abba;
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int err, ret;
+
+	ww_mutex_init(&abba.a_mutex, &ww_class);
+	ww_mutex_init(&abba.b_mutex, &ww_class);
+	INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&abba.work, test_abba_work);
+	init_completion(&abba.a_ready);
+	init_completion(&abba.b_ready);
+	abba.resolve = resolve;
+
+	schedule_work(&abba.work);
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+	ww_mutex_lock(&abba.a_mutex, &ctx);
+
+	complete(&abba.a_ready);
+	wait_for_completion(&abba.b_ready);
+
+	err = ww_mutex_lock(&abba.b_mutex, &ctx);
+	if (resolve && err == -EDEADLK) {
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&abba.a_mutex);
+		ww_mutex_lock_slow(&abba.b_mutex, &ctx);
+		err = ww_mutex_lock(&abba.a_mutex, &ctx);
+	}
+
+	if (!err)
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&abba.b_mutex);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&abba.a_mutex);
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+	flush_work(&abba.work);
+	destroy_work_on_stack(&abba.work);
+
+	ret = 0;
+	if (resolve) {
+		if (err || abba.result) {
+			pr_err("%s: failed to resolve ABBA deadlock, A err=%d, B err=%d\n",
+			       __func__, err, abba.result);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
+	} else {
+		if (err != -EDEADLK && abba.result != -EDEADLK) {
+			pr_err("%s: missed ABBA deadlock, A err=%d, B err=%d\n",
+			       __func__, err, abba.result);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -165,6 +255,14 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = test_abba(false);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = test_abba(true);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.10.2

[tip:locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Add kselftests for ww_mutex ABBA deadlock detection

[tip-bot for Chris Wilson]

Commit-ID:  70207686e492fb97c11d88ae7d8ebce7d2d080aa
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/70207686e492fb97c11d88ae7d8ebce7d2d080aa
Author:     Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
AuthorDate: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:47:08 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:37:16 +0100

locking/ww_mutex: Add kselftests for ww_mutex ABBA deadlock detection

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161201114711.28697-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
index 835fa7a..5a643ba 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -153,6 +153,96 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
+struct test_abba {
+	struct work_struct work;
+	struct ww_mutex a_mutex;
+	struct ww_mutex b_mutex;
+	struct completion a_ready;
+	struct completion b_ready;
+	bool resolve;
+	int result;
+};
+
+static void test_abba_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct test_abba *abba = container_of(work, typeof(*abba), work);
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int err;
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+	ww_mutex_lock(&abba->b_mutex, &ctx);
+
+	complete(&abba->b_ready);
+	wait_for_completion(&abba->a_ready);
+
+	err = ww_mutex_lock(&abba->a_mutex, &ctx);
+	if (abba->resolve && err == -EDEADLK) {
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&abba->b_mutex);
+		ww_mutex_lock_slow(&abba->a_mutex, &ctx);
+		err = ww_mutex_lock(&abba->b_mutex, &ctx);
+	}
+
+	if (!err)
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&abba->a_mutex);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&abba->b_mutex);
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+	abba->result = err;
+}
+
+static int test_abba(bool resolve)
+{
+	struct test_abba abba;
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int err, ret;
+
+	ww_mutex_init(&abba.a_mutex, &ww_class);
+	ww_mutex_init(&abba.b_mutex, &ww_class);
+	INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&abba.work, test_abba_work);
+	init_completion(&abba.a_ready);
+	init_completion(&abba.b_ready);
+	abba.resolve = resolve;
+
+	schedule_work(&abba.work);
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+	ww_mutex_lock(&abba.a_mutex, &ctx);
+
+	complete(&abba.a_ready);
+	wait_for_completion(&abba.b_ready);
+
+	err = ww_mutex_lock(&abba.b_mutex, &ctx);
+	if (resolve && err == -EDEADLK) {
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&abba.a_mutex);
+		ww_mutex_lock_slow(&abba.b_mutex, &ctx);
+		err = ww_mutex_lock(&abba.a_mutex, &ctx);
+	}
+
+	if (!err)
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&abba.b_mutex);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&abba.a_mutex);
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+	flush_work(&abba.work);
+	destroy_work_on_stack(&abba.work);
+
+	ret = 0;
+	if (resolve) {
+		if (err || abba.result) {
+			pr_err("%s: failed to resolve ABBA deadlock, A err=%d, B err=%d\n",
+			       __func__, err, abba.result);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
+	} else {
+		if (err != -EDEADLK && abba.result != -EDEADLK) {
+			pr_err("%s: missed ABBA deadlock, A err=%d, B err=%d\n",
+			       __func__, err, abba.result);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -165,6 +255,14 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = test_abba(false);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = test_abba(true);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 

[PATCH v2 6/8] locking: Add kselftests for resolving ww_mutex cyclic deadlocks

[Chris Wilson]

Check that ww_mutexes can detect cyclic deadlocks (generalised ABBA
cycles) and resolve them by lock reordering.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
index 5a643ba2b020..84da738e57d1 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -21,9 +21,11 @@
 #include <linux/completion.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
 
 static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(ww_class);
+struct workqueue_struct *wq;
 
 struct test_mutex {
 	struct work_struct work;
@@ -243,10 +245,118 @@ static int test_abba(bool resolve)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+struct test_cycle {
+	struct work_struct work;
+	struct ww_mutex a_mutex;
+	struct ww_mutex *b_mutex;
+	struct completion *a_signal;
+	struct completion b_signal;
+	int result;
+};
+
+static void test_cycle_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct test_cycle *cycle = container_of(work, typeof(*cycle), work);
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int err;
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+	ww_mutex_lock(&cycle->a_mutex, &ctx);
+
+	complete(cycle->a_signal);
+	wait_for_completion(&cycle->b_signal);
+
+	err = ww_mutex_lock(cycle->b_mutex, &ctx);
+	if (err == -EDEADLK) {
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&cycle->a_mutex);
+		ww_mutex_lock_slow(cycle->b_mutex, &ctx);
+		err = ww_mutex_lock(&cycle->a_mutex, &ctx);
+	}
+
+	if (!err)
+		ww_mutex_unlock(cycle->b_mutex);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&cycle->a_mutex);
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+	cycle->result = err;
+}
+
+static int __test_cycle(unsigned int nthreads)
+{
+	struct test_cycle *cycles;
+	unsigned int n, last = nthreads - 1;
+	int ret;
+
+	cycles = kmalloc_array(nthreads, sizeof(*cycles), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!cycles)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for (n = 0; n < nthreads; n++) {
+		struct test_cycle *cycle = &cycles[n];
+
+		ww_mutex_init(&cycle->a_mutex, &ww_class);
+		if (n == last)
+			cycle->b_mutex = &cycles[0].a_mutex;
+		else
+			cycle->b_mutex = &cycles[n + 1].a_mutex;
+
+		if (n == 0)
+			cycle->a_signal = &cycles[last].b_signal;
+		else
+			cycle->a_signal = &cycles[n - 1].b_signal;
+		init_completion(&cycle->b_signal);
+
+		INIT_WORK(&cycle->work, test_cycle_work);
+		cycle->result = 0;
+	}
+
+	for (n = 0; n < nthreads; n++)
+		queue_work(wq, &cycles[n].work);
+
+	flush_workqueue(wq);
+
+	ret = 0;
+	for (n = 0; n < nthreads; n++) {
+		struct test_cycle *cycle = &cycles[n];
+
+		if (!cycle->result)
+			continue;
+
+		pr_err("cylic deadlock not resolved, ret[%d/%d] = %d\n",
+		       n, nthreads, cycle->result);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	for (n = 0; n < nthreads; n++)
+		ww_mutex_destroy(&cycles[n].a_mutex);
+	kfree(cycles);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int test_cycle(unsigned int ncpus)
+{
+	unsigned int n;
+	int ret;
+
+	for (n = 2; n <= ncpus + 1; n++) {
+		ret = __test_cycle(n);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 {
+	int ncpus = num_online_cpus();
 	int ret;
 
+	wq = alloc_workqueue("test-ww_mutex", WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
+	if (!wq)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	ret = test_mutex();
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -263,11 +373,16 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = test_cycle(ncpus);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void __exit test_ww_mutex_exit(void)
 {
+	destroy_workqueue(wq);
 }
 
 module_init(test_ww_mutex_init);
-- 
2.10.2

[tip:locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Add kselftests for resolving ww_mutex cyclic deadlocks

[tip-bot for Chris Wilson]

Commit-ID:  d1b42b800e5d09dcee52812b4396aca3a3696ba9
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/d1b42b800e5d09dcee52812b4396aca3a3696ba9
Author:     Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
AuthorDate: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:47:09 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:37:16 +0100

locking/ww_mutex: Add kselftests for resolving ww_mutex cyclic deadlocks

Check that ww_mutexes can detect cyclic deadlocks (generalised ABBA
cycles) and resolve them by lock reordering.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161201114711.28697-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
index 5a643ba..84da738 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -21,9 +21,11 @@
 #include <linux/completion.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
 
 static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(ww_class);
+struct workqueue_struct *wq;
 
 struct test_mutex {
 	struct work_struct work;
@@ -243,10 +245,118 @@ static int test_abba(bool resolve)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+struct test_cycle {
+	struct work_struct work;
+	struct ww_mutex a_mutex;
+	struct ww_mutex *b_mutex;
+	struct completion *a_signal;
+	struct completion b_signal;
+	int result;
+};
+
+static void test_cycle_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct test_cycle *cycle = container_of(work, typeof(*cycle), work);
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int err;
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+	ww_mutex_lock(&cycle->a_mutex, &ctx);
+
+	complete(cycle->a_signal);
+	wait_for_completion(&cycle->b_signal);
+
+	err = ww_mutex_lock(cycle->b_mutex, &ctx);
+	if (err == -EDEADLK) {
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&cycle->a_mutex);
+		ww_mutex_lock_slow(cycle->b_mutex, &ctx);
+		err = ww_mutex_lock(&cycle->a_mutex, &ctx);
+	}
+
+	if (!err)
+		ww_mutex_unlock(cycle->b_mutex);
+	ww_mutex_unlock(&cycle->a_mutex);
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+	cycle->result = err;
+}
+
+static int __test_cycle(unsigned int nthreads)
+{
+	struct test_cycle *cycles;
+	unsigned int n, last = nthreads - 1;
+	int ret;
+
+	cycles = kmalloc_array(nthreads, sizeof(*cycles), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!cycles)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for (n = 0; n < nthreads; n++) {
+		struct test_cycle *cycle = &cycles[n];
+
+		ww_mutex_init(&cycle->a_mutex, &ww_class);
+		if (n == last)
+			cycle->b_mutex = &cycles[0].a_mutex;
+		else
+			cycle->b_mutex = &cycles[n + 1].a_mutex;
+
+		if (n == 0)
+			cycle->a_signal = &cycles[last].b_signal;
+		else
+			cycle->a_signal = &cycles[n - 1].b_signal;
+		init_completion(&cycle->b_signal);
+
+		INIT_WORK(&cycle->work, test_cycle_work);
+		cycle->result = 0;
+	}
+
+	for (n = 0; n < nthreads; n++)
+		queue_work(wq, &cycles[n].work);
+
+	flush_workqueue(wq);
+
+	ret = 0;
+	for (n = 0; n < nthreads; n++) {
+		struct test_cycle *cycle = &cycles[n];
+
+		if (!cycle->result)
+			continue;
+
+		pr_err("cylic deadlock not resolved, ret[%d/%d] = %d\n",
+		       n, nthreads, cycle->result);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	for (n = 0; n < nthreads; n++)
+		ww_mutex_destroy(&cycles[n].a_mutex);
+	kfree(cycles);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int test_cycle(unsigned int ncpus)
+{
+	unsigned int n;
+	int ret;
+
+	for (n = 2; n <= ncpus + 1; n++) {
+		ret = __test_cycle(n);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 {
+	int ncpus = num_online_cpus();
 	int ret;
 
+	wq = alloc_workqueue("test-ww_mutex", WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
+	if (!wq)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	ret = test_mutex();
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -263,11 +373,16 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = test_cycle(ncpus);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void __exit test_ww_mutex_exit(void)
 {
+	destroy_workqueue(wq);
 }
 
 module_init(test_ww_mutex_init);

[PATCH v2 7/8] locking: Add kselftests for ww_mutex stress

[Chris Wilson]

v2: Use both inorder and reorder locking strategies

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 254 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 254 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
index 84da738e57d1..da6c9a34f62f 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -19,8 +19,10 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 
 #include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/random.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
 
@@ -348,6 +350,246 @@ static int test_cycle(unsigned int ncpus)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+struct stress {
+	struct work_struct work;
+	struct ww_mutex *locks;
+	int nlocks;
+	int nloops;
+};
+
+static int *get_random_order(int count)
+{
+	int *order;
+	int n, r, tmp;
+
+	order = kmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*order), GFP_TEMPORARY);
+	if (!order)
+		return order;
+
+	for (n = 0; n < count; n++)
+		order[n] = n;
+
+	for (n = count - 1; n > 1; n--) {
+		r = get_random_int() % (n + 1);
+		if (r != n) {
+			tmp = order[n];
+			order[n] = order[r];
+			order[r] = tmp;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return order;
+}
+
+static void dummy_load(struct stress *stress)
+{
+	usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+}
+
+static void stress_inorder_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct stress *stress = container_of(work, typeof(*stress), work);
+	const int nlocks = stress->nlocks;
+	struct ww_mutex *locks = stress->locks;
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int *order;
+
+	order = get_random_order(nlocks);
+	if (!order)
+		return;
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+
+	do {
+		int contended = -1;
+		int n, err;
+
+retry:
+		err = 0;
+		for (n = 0; n < nlocks; n++) {
+			if (n == contended)
+				continue;
+
+			err = ww_mutex_lock(&locks[order[n]], &ctx);
+			if (err < 0)
+				break;
+		}
+		if (!err)
+			dummy_load(stress);
+
+		if (contended > n)
+			ww_mutex_unlock(&locks[order[contended]]);
+		contended = n;
+		while (n--)
+			ww_mutex_unlock(&locks[order[n]]);
+
+		if (err == -EDEADLK) {
+			ww_mutex_lock_slow(&locks[order[contended]], &ctx);
+			goto retry;
+		}
+
+		if (err) {
+			pr_err_once("stress (%s) failed with %d\n",
+				    __func__, err);
+			break;
+		}
+	} while (--stress->nloops);
+
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+	kfree(order);
+	kfree(stress);
+}
+
+struct reorder_lock {
+	struct list_head link;
+	struct ww_mutex *lock;
+};
+
+static void stress_reorder_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct stress *stress = container_of(work, typeof(*stress), work);
+	LIST_HEAD(locks);
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	struct reorder_lock *ll, *ln;
+	int *order;
+	int n, err;
+
+	order = get_random_order(stress->nlocks);
+	if (!order)
+		return;
+
+	for (n = 0; n < stress->nlocks; n++) {
+		ll = kmalloc(sizeof(*ll), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!ll)
+			goto out;
+
+		ll->lock = &stress->locks[order[n]];
+		list_add(&ll->link, &locks);
+	}
+	kfree(order);
+	order = NULL;
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+
+	do {
+		list_for_each_entry(ll, &locks, link) {
+			err = ww_mutex_lock(ll->lock, &ctx);
+			if (!err)
+				continue;
+
+			ln = ll;
+			list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(ln, &locks, link)
+				ww_mutex_unlock(ln->lock);
+
+			if (err != -EDEADLK) {
+				pr_err_once("stress (%s) failed with %d\n",
+					    __func__, err);
+				break;
+			}
+
+			ww_mutex_lock_slow(ll->lock, &ctx);
+			list_move(&ll->link, &locks); /* restarts iteration */
+		}
+
+		dummy_load(stress);
+		list_for_each_entry(ll, &locks, link)
+			ww_mutex_unlock(ll->lock);
+	} while (--stress->nloops);
+
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+out:
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(ll, ln, &locks, link)
+		kfree(ll);
+	kfree(order);
+	kfree(stress);
+}
+
+static void stress_one_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct stress *stress = container_of(work, typeof(*stress), work);
+	const int nlocks = stress->nlocks;
+	struct ww_mutex *lock = stress->locks + (get_random_int() % nlocks);
+	int err;
+
+	do {
+		err = ww_mutex_lock(lock, NULL);
+		if (!err) {
+			dummy_load(stress);
+			ww_mutex_unlock(lock);
+		} else {
+			pr_err_once("stress (%s) failed with %d\n",
+				    __func__, err);
+			break;
+		}
+	} while (--stress->nloops);
+
+	kfree(stress);
+}
+
+#define STRESS_INORDER BIT(0)
+#define STRESS_REORDER BIT(1)
+#define STRESS_ONE BIT(2)
+#define STRESS_ALL (STRESS_INORDER | STRESS_REORDER | STRESS_ONE)
+
+static int stress(int nlocks, int nthreads, int nloops, unsigned int flags)
+{
+	struct ww_mutex *locks;
+	int n;
+
+	locks = kmalloc_array(nlocks, sizeof(*locks), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!locks)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for (n = 0; n < nlocks; n++)
+		ww_mutex_init(&locks[n], &ww_class);
+
+	for (n = 0; nthreads; n++) {
+		struct stress *stress;
+		void (*fn)(struct work_struct *work);
+
+		fn = NULL;
+		switch (n & 3) {
+		case 0:
+			if (flags & STRESS_INORDER)
+				fn = stress_inorder_work;
+			break;
+		case 1:
+			if (flags & STRESS_REORDER)
+				fn = stress_reorder_work;
+			break;
+		case 2:
+			if (flags & STRESS_ONE)
+				fn = stress_one_work;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		if (!fn)
+			continue;
+
+		stress = kmalloc(sizeof(*stress), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!stress)
+			break;
+
+		INIT_WORK(&stress->work, fn);
+		stress->locks = locks;
+		stress->nlocks = nlocks;
+		stress->nloops = nloops;
+
+		queue_work(wq, &stress->work);
+		nthreads--;
+	}
+
+	flush_workqueue(wq);
+
+	for (n = 0; n < nlocks; n++)
+		ww_mutex_destroy(&locks[n]);
+	kfree(locks);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 {
 	int ncpus = num_online_cpus();
@@ -377,6 +619,18 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = stress(16, 2*ncpus, 1<<10, STRESS_INORDER);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = stress(16, 2*ncpus, 1<<10, STRESS_REORDER);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = stress(4096, hweight32(STRESS_ALL)*ncpus, 1<<12, STRESS_ALL);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.10.2

[tip:locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Add kselftests for ww_mutex stress

[tip-bot for Chris Wilson]

Commit-ID:  2a0c11282881875dc44f166a20eedf0d866dd0ef
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/2a0c11282881875dc44f166a20eedf0d866dd0ef
Author:     Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
AuthorDate: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:47:10 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:37:17 +0100

locking/ww_mutex: Add kselftests for ww_mutex stress

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161201114711.28697-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 254 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 254 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
index 84da738..da6c9a3 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
@@ -19,8 +19,10 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 
 #include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/random.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
 
@@ -348,6 +350,246 @@ static int test_cycle(unsigned int ncpus)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+struct stress {
+	struct work_struct work;
+	struct ww_mutex *locks;
+	int nlocks;
+	int nloops;
+};
+
+static int *get_random_order(int count)
+{
+	int *order;
+	int n, r, tmp;
+
+	order = kmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*order), GFP_TEMPORARY);
+	if (!order)
+		return order;
+
+	for (n = 0; n < count; n++)
+		order[n] = n;
+
+	for (n = count - 1; n > 1; n--) {
+		r = get_random_int() % (n + 1);
+		if (r != n) {
+			tmp = order[n];
+			order[n] = order[r];
+			order[r] = tmp;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return order;
+}
+
+static void dummy_load(struct stress *stress)
+{
+	usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+}
+
+static void stress_inorder_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct stress *stress = container_of(work, typeof(*stress), work);
+	const int nlocks = stress->nlocks;
+	struct ww_mutex *locks = stress->locks;
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	int *order;
+
+	order = get_random_order(nlocks);
+	if (!order)
+		return;
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+
+	do {
+		int contended = -1;
+		int n, err;
+
+retry:
+		err = 0;
+		for (n = 0; n < nlocks; n++) {
+			if (n == contended)
+				continue;
+
+			err = ww_mutex_lock(&locks[order[n]], &ctx);
+			if (err < 0)
+				break;
+		}
+		if (!err)
+			dummy_load(stress);
+
+		if (contended > n)
+			ww_mutex_unlock(&locks[order[contended]]);
+		contended = n;
+		while (n--)
+			ww_mutex_unlock(&locks[order[n]]);
+
+		if (err == -EDEADLK) {
+			ww_mutex_lock_slow(&locks[order[contended]], &ctx);
+			goto retry;
+		}
+
+		if (err) {
+			pr_err_once("stress (%s) failed with %d\n",
+				    __func__, err);
+			break;
+		}
+	} while (--stress->nloops);
+
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+	kfree(order);
+	kfree(stress);
+}
+
+struct reorder_lock {
+	struct list_head link;
+	struct ww_mutex *lock;
+};
+
+static void stress_reorder_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct stress *stress = container_of(work, typeof(*stress), work);
+	LIST_HEAD(locks);
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+	struct reorder_lock *ll, *ln;
+	int *order;
+	int n, err;
+
+	order = get_random_order(stress->nlocks);
+	if (!order)
+		return;
+
+	for (n = 0; n < stress->nlocks; n++) {
+		ll = kmalloc(sizeof(*ll), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!ll)
+			goto out;
+
+		ll->lock = &stress->locks[order[n]];
+		list_add(&ll->link, &locks);
+	}
+	kfree(order);
+	order = NULL;
+
+	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+
+	do {
+		list_for_each_entry(ll, &locks, link) {
+			err = ww_mutex_lock(ll->lock, &ctx);
+			if (!err)
+				continue;
+
+			ln = ll;
+			list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(ln, &locks, link)
+				ww_mutex_unlock(ln->lock);
+
+			if (err != -EDEADLK) {
+				pr_err_once("stress (%s) failed with %d\n",
+					    __func__, err);
+				break;
+			}
+
+			ww_mutex_lock_slow(ll->lock, &ctx);
+			list_move(&ll->link, &locks); /* restarts iteration */
+		}
+
+		dummy_load(stress);
+		list_for_each_entry(ll, &locks, link)
+			ww_mutex_unlock(ll->lock);
+	} while (--stress->nloops);
+
+	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+out:
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(ll, ln, &locks, link)
+		kfree(ll);
+	kfree(order);
+	kfree(stress);
+}
+
+static void stress_one_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct stress *stress = container_of(work, typeof(*stress), work);
+	const int nlocks = stress->nlocks;
+	struct ww_mutex *lock = stress->locks + (get_random_int() % nlocks);
+	int err;
+
+	do {
+		err = ww_mutex_lock(lock, NULL);
+		if (!err) {
+			dummy_load(stress);
+			ww_mutex_unlock(lock);
+		} else {
+			pr_err_once("stress (%s) failed with %d\n",
+				    __func__, err);
+			break;
+		}
+	} while (--stress->nloops);
+
+	kfree(stress);
+}
+
+#define STRESS_INORDER BIT(0)
+#define STRESS_REORDER BIT(1)
+#define STRESS_ONE BIT(2)
+#define STRESS_ALL (STRESS_INORDER | STRESS_REORDER | STRESS_ONE)
+
+static int stress(int nlocks, int nthreads, int nloops, unsigned int flags)
+{
+	struct ww_mutex *locks;
+	int n;
+
+	locks = kmalloc_array(nlocks, sizeof(*locks), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!locks)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for (n = 0; n < nlocks; n++)
+		ww_mutex_init(&locks[n], &ww_class);
+
+	for (n = 0; nthreads; n++) {
+		struct stress *stress;
+		void (*fn)(struct work_struct *work);
+
+		fn = NULL;
+		switch (n & 3) {
+		case 0:
+			if (flags & STRESS_INORDER)
+				fn = stress_inorder_work;
+			break;
+		case 1:
+			if (flags & STRESS_REORDER)
+				fn = stress_reorder_work;
+			break;
+		case 2:
+			if (flags & STRESS_ONE)
+				fn = stress_one_work;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		if (!fn)
+			continue;
+
+		stress = kmalloc(sizeof(*stress), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!stress)
+			break;
+
+		INIT_WORK(&stress->work, fn);
+		stress->locks = locks;
+		stress->nlocks = nlocks;
+		stress->nloops = nloops;
+
+		queue_work(wq, &stress->work);
+		nthreads--;
+	}
+
+	flush_workqueue(wq);
+
+	for (n = 0; n < nlocks; n++)
+		ww_mutex_destroy(&locks[n]);
+	kfree(locks);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 {
 	int ncpus = num_online_cpus();
@@ -377,6 +619,18 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = stress(16, 2*ncpus, 1<<10, STRESS_INORDER);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = stress(16, 2*ncpus, 1<<10, STRESS_REORDER);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = stress(4096, hweight32(STRESS_ALL)*ncpus, 1<<12, STRESS_ALL);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 

Re: [tip:locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Add kselftests for ww_mutex stress

[Peter Zijlstra]

Hi Chris,

I got me this... I'm still trying to wrap my head around what exactly
the test does.

=====================================
[ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
4.10.0-rc4-00122-g6edad167-dirty #608 Not tainted
-------------------------------------
kworker/u81:37/330 is trying to release lock (ww_class_mutex) at:
[<ffffffff8115260a>] stress_inorder_work+0x15a/0x330
but there are no more locks to release!

other info that might help us debug this:
4 locks held by kworker/u81:37/330:
 #0:  ("test-ww_mutex"){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff81111d62>] process_one_work+0x1f2/0x710
 #1:  ((&stress->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81111d62>] process_one_work+0x1f2/0x710
 #2:  (ww_class_acquire){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81111ddd>] process_one_work+0x26d/0x710
 #3:  (ww_class_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff811525ba>] stress_inorder_work+0x10a/0x330

stack backtrace:
CPU: 22 PID: 330 Comm: kworker/u81:37 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc4-00122-g6edad167-dirty #608
Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600GZ/S2600GZ, BIOS SE5C600.86B.02.02.0002.122320131210 12/23/2013
Workqueue: test-ww_mutex stress_inorder_work
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x86/0xc3
 ? stress_inorder_work+0x15a/0x330
 print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0xd8/0xe0
 ? stress_inorder_work+0x15a/0x330
 lock_release+0x374/0x4b0
 ? schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0xda/0x270
 __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x43/0x2e0
 ww_mutex_unlock+0x47/0xb0
 stress_inorder_work+0x15a/0x330
 ? process_one_work+0x26d/0x710
 process_one_work+0x26d/0x710
 ? process_one_work+0x1f2/0x710
 worker_thread+0x48/0x4e0
 kthread+0x101/0x140
 ? process_one_work+0x710/0x710
 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40
INFO: task swapper/0:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      Not tainted 4.10.0-rc4-00122-g6edad167-dirty #608
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
swapper/0       D    0     1      0 0x00000000
Call Trace:
 __schedule+0x30a/0xc60
 schedule+0x40/0x90
 schedule_timeout+0x30a/0x670
 ? wait_for_completion+0x23/0x100
 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x100/0x1c0
 wait_for_completion+0x97/0x100
 ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
 flush_workqueue+0x1f6/0x6b0
 ? flush_workqueue+0xe8/0x6b0
 stress+0x1b3/0x203
 test_ww_mutex_init+0x30a/0x324
 ? __pv_init_lock_hash+0x59/0x59
 ? set_debug_rodata+0x12/0x12
 do_one_initcall+0x43/0x180
 ? set_debug_rodata+0x12/0x12
 kernel_init_freeable+0x1d9/0x266
 ? rest_init+0x140/0x140
 kernel_init+0xe/0x100
 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40
INFO: lockdep is turned off. +

[PATCH v2 8/8] locking: Add ww_mutex to tools/testing/selftests

[Chris Wilson]

Add the minimal test running (modprobe test-ww_mutex) to the kselftests
CI framework.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/locking/ww_mutex.sh | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/locking/ww_mutex.sh

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/locking/ww_mutex.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/locking/ww_mutex.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..6905da965f3b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/locking/ww_mutex.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# Runs API tests for struct ww_mutex (Wait/Wound mutexes)
+
+if /sbin/modprobe -q test-ww_mutex; then
+       /sbin/modprobe -q -r test-ww_mutex
+       echo "locking/ww_mutex: ok"
+else
+       echo "locking/ww_mutex: [FAIL]"
+       exit 1
+fi
-- 
2.10.2

[tip:locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Add ww_mutex to tools/testing/selftests

[tip-bot for Chris Wilson]

Commit-ID:  2b0b211134a65401ed874ce0d5d48844f4f6f341
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/2b0b211134a65401ed874ce0d5d48844f4f6f341
Author:     Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
AuthorDate: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:47:11 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:37:17 +0100

locking/ww_mutex: Add ww_mutex to tools/testing/selftests

Add the minimal test running (modprobe test-ww_mutex) to the kselftests
CI framework.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161201114711.28697-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/locking/ww_mutex.sh | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/locking/ww_mutex.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/locking/ww_mutex.sh
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6905da9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/locking/ww_mutex.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# Runs API tests for struct ww_mutex (Wait/Wound mutexes)
+
+if /sbin/modprobe -q test-ww_mutex; then
+       /sbin/modprobe -q -r test-ww_mutex
+       echo "locking/ww_mutex: ok"
+else
+       echo "locking/ww_mutex: [FAIL]"
+       exit 1
+fi

Re: locking: Add kselftests for ww_mutex

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Chris,

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Nicolai Hähnle was looking into a deadlock within ww_mutexes (that has
> been fixed by Peter's mutex rewrite) and to support his changes, I
> thought it was be useful to have a small validation suite for ww_mutex.

How long do these selftests typically take?
Do they need multiple CPU cores, lots of memory?
I.e. after how much time without any output should I start to worry
(on an emulated
Atari running Linux/m68k ;-)?

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds