From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] IB: Switch from struct ib_dma_mapping_ops to struct dma_mapping_ops Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:24:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20161209182429.GF16622@lst.de> References: <07c07529-4636-fafb-2598-7358d8a1460d@sandisk.com> <25d066c2-59d7-2be7-dd56-e29e99b43620@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25d066c2-59d7-2be7-dd56-e29e99b43620-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Doug Ledford , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > Additionally, use dma_noop_ops instead of duplicating it. Oops, I don't think that part actually is correct. Both rdmavt and the weird intel drivers want the _virtual_ address in their dma address instead of the physical one set by dma_noop_ops. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html