From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754144AbcLLFtz (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:49:55 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:49359 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750780AbcLLFty (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:49:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:49:51 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Matthew Wilcox Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20161212164951.703f26d9@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in: lib/radix-tree.c between commit: 2b41226b39b6 ("Revert "radix tree test suite: fix compilation"") from Linus' tree and patch: "reimplement IDR and IDA using the radix tree" from the akpm tree. I fixed it up (I added back the include of notifier.h) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell