On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:36:47AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 02:09:27AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > 2016年12月14日 上午1:17,"Mark Rutland" 写道: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:56:46AM +0000, Colin King wrote: > > > > From: Colin Ian King > > > > > > > > mask and bit are unsigned longs, so if bit is 31 we end up sign > > > > extending the 1 and mask ends up as 0xffffffff80000000. Fix this > > > > by explicitly adding integer suffix UL ensure 1 is a unsigned long > > > > rather than an signed int. > > > > > > > > Issue found with static analysis with CoverityScan, CID 1388564 > > > > > > > > Fixes: 8965c3ce4718754db ("rcu: Use > > leaf_node_for_each_mask_possible_cpu() in force_qs_rnp()") > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > > > > --- > > > > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > > > index 10162ac..6ecedd8 100644 > > > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > > > @@ -3051,7 +3051,7 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, > > > > > > > > leaf_node_for_each_mask_possible_cpu(rnp, rnp->qsmask, > > bit, cpu) > > > > if (f(per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu), isidle, maxj)) > > > > - mask |= 1 << bit; > > > > + mask |= 1UL << bit; > > > > > > So as to match the rest of the code altered in commit bc75e99983df1efd > > > ("rcu: Correctly handle sparse possible cpus"), and regardless of > > > naming, I think it'd be nicer to use leaf_node_cpu_bit(), e.g. > > > > > > leaf_node_for_each_mask_possible_cpu(rnp, rnp->qsmask, bit, cpu) > > > if (f(per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu), isidle, maxj)) > > > mask |= leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu); > > > > > > IMO, it would be nice to hide the iterator bit somehow, to match > > > for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(), which this largely looks similar to > > > otherwise. > > > > Good point. ;-) > > > > We can > > > > #define for_each_leaf_node_cpu(rnp, mask, cpu) \ > > for((cpu) = (rnp)->grplo + find _first_bit(mask, MASK_BITS(mask)); \ > > (cpu) >= (rnp)->grplo && (cpu) <= (rnp)->grphi; \ > > (cpu) = (rnp)->grplo + find _next_bit(mask, ..., > > leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu) + 1))) \ > > if (!cpu_possible(cpu)) \ > > continue; \ > > else > > What is the purpose of the cpu_possible() check? > To filter out CPUs in range [grplo, grphi] but not in cpu_possible_mask. Regards, Boqun > Thanx, Paul > > > Typing from my cellphone, plz ignore the bad formatting ;-) > > > > Regards, > > Boqun > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mark. >