From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53899 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753055AbcLNVwB (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:52:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:51:58 -0500 From: Brian Foster Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: don't rely on ->total in xfs_alloc_space_available Message-ID: <20161214215158.GB26688@bfoster.bfoster> References: <1481644767-9098-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1481644767-9098-5-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20161214183017.GD24645@bfoster.bfoster> <20161214193802.GB12217@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161214193802.GB12217@lst.de> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, eguan@redhat.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:38:02PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:30:18PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > > > /* do we have enough contiguous free space for the allocation? */ > > > + alloc_len = args->minlen + (args->alignment - 1)+ args->minalignslop; > > > > Whitespace nit, missing space: ^ > > > > Also, is the addition of braces intentional? I believe it is possible > > for args->alignment == 0. > > It's mostly for explaining the - 1 to the reader as it took me a while > to figure out what it was for. Oh, care to elaborate? :) Brian