All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Inlined functions in perf report
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:20:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161221102035.GA31703@sesse.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8193556.VWj3dM7HSI@milian-kdab2>

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:09:42AM +0100, Milian Wolff wrote:
> Just to check - did you really compile your code with frame pointers? By 
> default, that is not the case, and the above will try to do frame pointer 
> unwinding which will then fail. Put differently - do you any stack frames at 
> all? Can you try `perf record --call-graph dwarf` instead? Of course, make 
> sure you compile your code with `-g -O2` or similar.

I don't specifically use -fno-omit-frame-pointer, no. But the normal stack
unwinding works just fine with mainline perf nevertheless; is this expected?

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-21 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-20 11:59 Inlined functions in perf report Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-20 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-20 13:27   ` Milian Wolff
2016-12-20 13:43     ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-20 14:03       ` Milian Wolff
2016-12-20 13:54     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-12-20 14:05       ` Milian Wolff
2016-12-20 14:08       ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-20 14:37         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-12-20 17:01           ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-21  0:53             ` Jin, Yao
2016-12-21  9:58               ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-21 10:09                 ` Milian Wolff
2016-12-21 10:20                   ` Steinar H. Gunderson [this message]
2016-12-21 22:56                     ` Jin, Yao
2016-12-21 22:58                       ` Steinar H. Gunderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161221102035.GA31703@sesse.net \
    --to=sgunderson@bigfoot.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.