From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67211FCA5 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 06:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750814AbcL1GnA (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2016 01:43:00 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:60895 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750758AbcL1Gm7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2016 01:42:59 -0500 Received: (qmail 4953 invoked by uid 109); 28 Dec 2016 06:42:58 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 06:42:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 16126 invoked by uid 111); 28 Dec 2016 06:43:44 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 01:43:44 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 28 Dec 2016 01:42:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 01:42:55 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Stefan Beller Cc: Javantea , Junio C Hamano , "git@vger.kernel.org" , aneesh.kumar@gmail.com Subject: Re: Gitview Shell Injection Vulnerability Message-ID: <20161228064255.f4akjdsq24r2hqn7@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20161227082922.8B7A813893D@mail.altsci.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:45:58AM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote: > > I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area > > to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming > > projects on their own, or moving to the toplevel directory. On > > the other hand, I expect I'll be proposing removal of disused > > and inactive ones from time to time. > > Maybe it's time for a spring cleanup and remove some old (dead?) > projects from contrib? Yeah, that was my thought on reading the vulnerability report: "that's still around?". Looks like it hasn't had a substantive commit since 2007. But I dunno, maybe it's just finished, and doesn't need any more changes. :) -Peff