From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] sctp: add support for generating stream reconf chunks Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:53:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20170109.105301.469495957021068521.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20170109124325.GB20973@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lucien.xin@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, vyasevich@gmail.com To: nhorman@tuxdriver.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:39814 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757573AbdAIPxD (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2017 10:53:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170109124325.GB20973@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Neil Horman Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 07:43:25 -0500 > These all look reasonably good, but it seems before we accept them, > there should be an additional patch that actually makes use of the code. > I presume that is forthcomming? This all comes from my asking that the original huge set of patches be split up. People always just rush this kind of work and never think about laying out the resubmission properly. One should always only submit new interfaces along with an actual use because only with a use can we properly review whether the new interface is good or not. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 15:53:01 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] sctp: add support for generating stream reconf chunks Message-Id: <20170109.105301.469495957021068521.davem@davemloft.net> List-Id: References: <20170109124325.GB20973@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> In-Reply-To: <20170109124325.GB20973@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: nhorman@tuxdriver.com Cc: lucien.xin@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, vyasevich@gmail.com From: Neil Horman Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 07:43:25 -0500 > These all look reasonably good, but it seems before we accept them, > there should be an additional patch that actually makes use of the code. > I presume that is forthcomming? This all comes from my asking that the original huge set of patches be split up. People always just rush this kind of work and never think about laying out the resubmission properly. One should always only submit new interfaces along with an actual use because only with a use can we properly review whether the new interface is good or not.