All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 4/4] perf-probe: Find probe events without target module
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:44:55 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170116184455.GA14872@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148411457651.9978.9001772639862860573.stgit@devbox>

Em Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:03:06PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> Find probe events without -m "module" option. If perf-probe
> failed to find given function in kernel image, it tries to
> find same symbol and module in kallsyms, and retry search
> in the found module. E.g.
> 
>   # perf probe -D i915_capabilities
>   p:probe/i915_capabilities i915:i915_capabilities+0
> 
> Note: without -m option, perf probe can not find inlined
> function since there is no symbol information in kallsyms.

As this is a new feature, I'll postpone merging it till we get
perf/urgent, with the first three patches in this series, merged into
perf/core, ok?

- Arnaldo
 
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> ---
>   Changes in v2:
>    - Fix to remove unneeded zero-return.
>    - Remove unneeded debug message.
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/probe-event.c |   69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> index 6a6f44d..715f330 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> @@ -858,11 +858,7 @@ static int try_to_find_probe_trace_events(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
>  
>  	debuginfo__delete(dinfo);
>  
> -	if (ntevs == 0)	{	/* No error but failed to find probe point. */
> -		pr_warning("Probe point '%s' not found.\n",
> -			   synthesize_perf_probe_point(&pev->point));
> -		return -ENOENT;
> -	} else if (ntevs < 0) {
> +	if (ntevs < 0) {
>  		/* Error path : ntevs < 0 */
>  		pr_debug("An error occurred in debuginfo analysis (%d).\n", ntevs);
>  		if (ntevs == -EBADF)
> @@ -2829,9 +2825,7 @@ static int find_probe_trace_events_from_map(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
>  	 */
>  	num_matched_functions = find_probe_functions(map, pp->function, syms);
>  	if (num_matched_functions == 0) {
> -		pr_err("Failed to find symbol %s in %s\n", pp->function,
> -			pev->target ? : "kernel");
> -		ret = -ENOENT;
> +		ret = 0;
>  		goto out;
>  	} else if (num_matched_functions > probe_conf.max_probes) {
>  		pr_err("Too many functions matched in %s\n",
> @@ -3233,6 +3227,42 @@ static int find_probe_trace_events_from_cache(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int __convert_to_probe_trace_events(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
> +					   struct probe_trace_event **tevs)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* At first, we need to lookup cache entry */
> +	ret = find_probe_trace_events_from_cache(pev, tevs);
> +	if (ret > 0 || pev->sdt)	/* SDT can be found only in the cache */
> +		return ret == 0 ? -ENOENT : ret; /* Found in probe cache */
> +
> +	/* Convert perf_probe_event with debuginfo */
> +	ret = try_to_find_probe_trace_events(pev, tevs);
> +	if (ret != 0)
> +		return ret;	/* Found in debuginfo or got an error */
> +
> +	return find_probe_trace_events_from_map(pev, tevs);
> +}
> +
> +static char *find_module_from_kallsyms(const char *symbol_name)
> +{
> +	struct machine *machine = machine__new_kallsyms();
> +	struct symbol *sym;
> +	struct map *map;
> +	char *module;
> +
> +	sym = machine__find_kernel_function_by_name(machine, symbol_name, &map);
> +	if (!sym || map->dso->short_name[0] != '[')
> +		return NULL;
> +	pr_debug("Found %s in %s\n", sym->name, map->dso->short_name);
> +	module = strdup(map->dso->short_name + 1);
> +	if (module)
> +		module[strlen(module) - 1] = '\0';
> +
> +	return module;
> +}
> +
>  static int convert_to_probe_trace_events(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
>  					 struct probe_trace_event **tevs)
>  {
> @@ -3255,17 +3285,20 @@ static int convert_to_probe_trace_events(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
>  	if (ret > 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	/* At first, we need to lookup cache entry */
> -	ret = find_probe_trace_events_from_cache(pev, tevs);
> -	if (ret > 0 || pev->sdt)	/* SDT can be found only in the cache */
> -		return ret == 0 ? -ENOENT : ret; /* Found in probe cache */
> -
> -	/* Convert perf_probe_event with debuginfo */
> -	ret = try_to_find_probe_trace_events(pev, tevs);
> -	if (ret != 0)
> -		return ret;	/* Found in debuginfo or got an error */
> +	ret = __convert_to_probe_trace_events(pev, tevs);
> +	/* Not found. will retry to check kmodule if possible */
> +	if (ret == 0 && !pev->uprobes && !pev->target) {
> +		pev->target = find_module_from_kallsyms(pev->point.function);
> +		if (pev->target)
> +			ret = __convert_to_probe_trace_events(pev, tevs);
> +	}
>  
> -	return find_probe_trace_events_from_map(pev, tevs);
> +	if (ret == 0) {
> +		pr_warning("Probe point '%s' not found.\n",
> +			   synthesize_perf_probe_point(&pev->point));
> +		ret = -ENOENT;
> +	}
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  int convert_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-16 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-11  5:58 [PATCH perf/core v2 0/4] perf-probe: Fix and improve module probe events Masami Hiramatsu
2017-01-11  5:59 ` [PATCH perf/core v2 1/4] perf-probe: Fix to show correct locations for events on modules Masami Hiramatsu
2017-01-16 18:32   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-01-18  9:22   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf probe: " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2017-01-11  6:00 ` [PATCH perf/core v2 2/4] perf-probe: Add error checks to offline probe post-processing Masami Hiramatsu
2017-01-18  9:22   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf probe: " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2017-01-11  6:01 ` [PATCH perf/core v2 3/4] perf-probe: Fix to probe on gcc generated functions in modules Masami Hiramatsu
2017-01-18  9:23   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf probe: " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2017-01-11  6:03 ` [PATCH perf/core v2 4/4] perf-probe: Find probe events without target module Masami Hiramatsu
2017-01-16 18:44   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2017-01-16 22:21     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-01-16  8:08 ` [PATCH perf/core v2 0/4] perf-probe: Fix and improve module probe events Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170116184455.GA14872@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 4/4] perf-probe: Find probe events without target module' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.