From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:59988 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750703AbdAWJmL (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 04:42:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:42:05 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Linux-Renesas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM/arm64: dts: renesas: Link ARM GIC to clock and clock domain Message-ID: <20170123094204.GJ31651@verge.net.au> References: <1484657360-13101-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20170123092330.GF31651@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:26:34AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:49:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> This patch series improves the topology description in DT of the ARM GIC > >> on Renesas SoCs using the CPG/MSSR bindings (R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G). > >> It links the GIC to its module clock, and adds it to the SYSC "always > >> on" PM Domain. > >> > >> Note that currently the GIC-400 driver doesn't support module clocks nor > >> Runtime PM, so this must be handled as a critical clock. > >> As the CPG/MSSR driver, unlike the legacy MSTP driver, is already aware > >> of critical clocks, this series can be applied right now. > > > > does the note above imply that "[PATCH 0/2] clk: renesas: Use > > CLK_IS_CRITICAL to handle critical clocks" is a dependency of this series? > > No, the note says (using different wording) that there is no such dependency. Thanks, I see that now. I have queued up these changes. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:42:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ARM/arm64: dts: renesas: Link ARM GIC to clock and clock domain In-Reply-To: References: <1484657360-13101-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20170123092330.GF31651@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <20170123094204.GJ31651@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:26:34AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:49:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> This patch series improves the topology description in DT of the ARM GIC > >> on Renesas SoCs using the CPG/MSSR bindings (R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G). > >> It links the GIC to its module clock, and adds it to the SYSC "always > >> on" PM Domain. > >> > >> Note that currently the GIC-400 driver doesn't support module clocks nor > >> Runtime PM, so this must be handled as a critical clock. > >> As the CPG/MSSR driver, unlike the legacy MSTP driver, is already aware > >> of critical clocks, this series can be applied right now. > > > > does the note above imply that "[PATCH 0/2] clk: renesas: Use > > CLK_IS_CRITICAL to handle critical clocks" is a dependency of this series? > > No, the note says (using different wording) that there is no such dependency. Thanks, I see that now. I have queued up these changes.