From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mk: optimize directory dependencies
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:50:00 +0100
Message-ID: <20170124155000.2341e579@glumotte.dev.6wind.com>
References: <20170123181813.00567e47@platinum>
 <1485191953-2613-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <20170124114013.GA4609@localhost.localdomain>
 <20170124121506.GA160692@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20170124125652.GA7561@localhost.localdomain>
 <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B035B8DFDE@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>, Olivier Matz
 <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Yigit, Ferruh"
 <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "thomas.monjalon@6wind.com"
 <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BCD2A5B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:50:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id c206so213255994wme.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 06:50:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B035B8DFDE@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:26:41 +0000, "Richardson, Bruce"
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> Ok. Point taken for the lower-core count parts.
> 
> Thomas - can at least one of these patches be merged into 17.02,
> since it will definitely help us developers? [If Olivier's is too big
> a change at this point in the cycle, can Ferruh's be taken as an
> intermediate fix for this release before merging Olivier's in 17.05?]

It looks to be a good option. Ferruh's patch is less risky for 17.02.

Regards,
Olivier